Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

11:03
Robotic Left Hepatectomy using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging for an Intrahepatic Complex Biliary Cyst
Published on: June 24, 2022
5.7K
Transatlantic registries for minimally invasive liver surgery: towards harmonization
Nicky van der Heijde1,2,3, Burak Görgec1,2,3,4, Joal D Beane5
1Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Surgical Endoscopy
|January 9, 2023
Summary
Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) patient data varies across transatlantic registries, yet mortality remains low (<1.1%). Harmonizing data collection using key variables is crucial for future collaborative research in MILS.
Area of Science:
- Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Surgical Registries
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
Background:
- Multiple registries collect data on patients undergoing minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS).
- Transatlantic registries exhibit variations in collected variables, patient characteristics, indications, and treatments for MILS.
- Identifying key variables is essential for comparative analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare transatlantic registries for liver surgery based on collected variables.
- To identify differences in baseline characteristics, indications, and treatment for MILS patients.
- To establish a consensus on key variables for MILS research.
Main Methods:
- Five liver surgery registries (North America, Italy, Norway, Netherlands, Europe) were compared.
- Key variables were established by expert consensus and compared across registries.
- Anonymized MILS data (January 2014-December 2019) were analyzed, presenting largest differences (RLD, ALD) in patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes.
Main Results:
- 13,571 MILS patients were included; 30- and 90-day mortality were consistently below 1.1%.
- Significant variations observed in ASA grade 3-4 (RLD 3.0) and liver cirrhosis (RLD 6.4).
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use varied (RLD 4.3); collected variables ranged from 28 to 303, with 34 key variables missing in at least one registry.
Conclusions:
- Despite variations in patient data and treatment, MILS demonstrates consistently low mortality (<1.1%) across registries.
- Harmonization of MILS registries is recommended to enable future collaborative research.
- The identified 46 key variables are instrumental for standardizing MILS data collection and analysis.
Keywords:
Laparoscopic liver surgeryLiver surgeryMinimally invasive liver surgeryNationwide registriesRobotic liver surgery
