Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

An Organotypic High Throughput System for Characterization of Drug Sensitivity of Primary Multiple Myeloma Cells
Published on: July 15, 2015
In Silico Re-Optimization of Atezolizumab Dosing Using Population Pharmacokinetic Simulation and Exposure-Response
Cody J Peer1, Keith T Schmidt1, Oluwatobi Arisa1
1Clinical Pharmacology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract:
Atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), was initially approved in 2016, around the same time that the sponsor published the minimum serum concentration to maintain the saturation of receptor occupancy (6 microg/mL). The initially approved dose regimen of 1200 mg every 3 weeks (q3w) was subsequently modified to 840 mg q2w or 1680 mg q4w through pharmacokinetic simulations. Yet, each standard regimen yields steady-state trough concentrations (CMIN,SS ) far exceeding (≈ 40-fold) the stated target concentration. Additionally, the steady-state area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUCSS ) at 1200 mg q3w was significantly (P = .027) correlated with the probability of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and, coupled with excess exposure, this provides incentive to explore alternative dose regimens to lower the exposure burden while maintaining an effective CMIN,SS . In this study, we first identified 840 mg q6w as an extended-interval regimen that could robustly maintain a serum concentration of 6 microg/mL (≥99% of virtual patients simulated, n = 1000), then applied this regimen to an approach that administers 2 "loading doses" of standard-interval regimens for a future clinical trial aiming to personalize dose regimens. Each standard dose was simulated for 2 loading doses, then 840 mg q6w thereafter; all yielded cycle-7 CMIN,SS values of >6 microg/mL in >99% of virtual patients. Further, the AUCSS from 840 mg q6w resulted in a flattening (P = .63) of the exposure-response relationship with adverse events of special interest (AESIs). We next aim to verify this in a clinical trial seeking to validate extended-interval dosing in a personalized approach using therapeutic drug monitoring.
More Related Videos
13:34A Combined 3D Tissue Engineered In Vitro/In Silico Lung Tumor Model for Predicting Drug Effectiveness in Specific Mutational Backgrounds
Published on: April 6, 2016
09:44Pretargeted Radioimmunotherapy Based on the Inverse Electron Demand Diels-Alder Reaction
Published on: January 29, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Model-Independent Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Noncompartmental Analysis
One important characteristic of noncompartmental analyses is that drug exposure increases proportionally with increasing doses. This...
Pharmacokinetic Models: Overview
There are three primary types of models: empirical, compartment, and physiological. Empirical models, with minimal...