Ventricular Functional Analysis in Congenital Complete Heart Block Using Speckle Tracking: Left Ventricular

Diana Milagros Torpoco Rivera1, Chenni Sriram2, Peter P Karpawich2

  • 1Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Michigan, Department of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, 3901 Beaubien, Boulevard, Detroit, MI, 48201, USA. dianatorpoco1202@gmail.com.

Pediatric Cardiology
|January 10, 2023
PubMed

Insights

Speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) revealed subtle left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) patients with pacemakers. Transvenous right ventricular septal pacing better preserved LV systolic function than epicardial pacing.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Cardiac Pacing

Background:

  • Congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) often requires permanent pacing.
  • Right ventricular (RV) apical pacing is linked to left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and dysfunction.
  • Alternative pacing sites are explored to mitigate these adverse effects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare LV function between LV epicardial pacing (LVEp) and RV transvenous pacing (RVSp) in CCAVB patients.
  • To assess LV function using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective, single-center study of CCAVB patients (≤18 years at implant).
  • Comparison with age- and gender-matched healthy controls.
  • Comprehensive LV function assessment using conventional 2D echocardiography and STE.

Main Results:

  • Conventional echocardiography (SF, EF) showed normal LV function in pacemaker patients versus controls.
  • STE detected abnormal LV myocardial and endocardial strain in pacemaker patients.
  • STE revealed significantly better LV systolic function preservation with RVSp compared to LVEp.

Conclusions:

  • STE is more sensitive than conventional echocardiography for detecting subtle LV dysfunction in CCAVB patients with pacemakers.
  • Transvenous RV septal pacing is associated with superior LV systolic function preservation compared to LV epicardial pacing.
Abstract