Transurethral resection of bladder cancer with or without fluorescence
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy of the Urinary Tract: The Technique
Published on: January 10, 2013
Jakub Horňák1, Antonín Brisuda, Marek Babjuk
1Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Purpose Of Review:
Transurethral resection of bladder cancer (TURBT) is in its standard form an inherently imperfect technique. Fluorescence-guided photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) represents one way to improve the outcome by enhancing tumour detection. Fluorescence has been used in connection with bladder cancer since the 1970s, with a number of studies being published since then. However, the method is still not recommended as a standard part of TURBT mainly because of the limited level of evidence of concerned studies, questionable cost-effectiveness and even contradictory results. The review lists the latest articles covering this topic.
Recent Findings:
Several recently published meta-analyses reviewed a series of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning PDD assisted TURBT. Results were generally supporting the positive effect on reduction of recurrence rate. However, the mentioned meta-analyses are overlapping in terms of reviewed RCT that provide only a low level of evidence according to a recent Cochrane review. Supposed limitations of PDD (timing of the procedure, low specificity) and possible solutions are also covered.
Summary:
Most of the published data confirmed reduced early recurrence rate after PDD assisted TURBT comparing to standard TURBT. Its impact on late recurrence rate, progression rate or cost-effectiveness has not been sufficiently demonstrated.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

