Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

10:32
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
18.5K
The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Utility
Joseph R Duffy1, Peter R Martin2, Heather M Clark1
1Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
|January 11, 2023
Summary
The Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS-3.5) is a reliable and valid tool for assessing apraxia of speech (AOS) severity and features. It demonstrates excellent accuracy in identifying AOS in patients with neurodegenerative diseases.
Area of Science:
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Neurogenic Communication Disorders
- Clinical Assessment Tools
Background:
- Apraxia of speech (AOS) is a motor speech disorder affecting speech planning and programming.
- Accurate assessment is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning in neurogenic communication disorders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the interrater reliability and validity of the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS-3.5).
- To determine the scale's effectiveness in indexing AOS presence, severity, and key features.
Main Methods:
- Interrater reliability assessed with 27 participants.
- Validity examined in 308 participants (120 with AOS, 188 without) using item analysis and correlation with independent clinical ratings.
- Regression models used to predict AOS presence.
Main Results:
- The ASRS-3.5 demonstrated good to excellent interrater reliability for individual items and excellent reliability for the total score.
- The scale effectively differentiated between participants with and without AOS.
- Total scores below 7 and above 10 showed excellent diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for AOS.
Conclusions:
- The ASRS-3.5 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing AOS presence, severity, and features.
- The scale exhibits high sensitivity and specificity, distinguishing AOS from aphasia and dysarthria in neurodegenerative conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
Self-Report Tests of Personality
415
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
415

