Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Echocardiographic and Histological Examination of Cardiac Morphology in the Mouse
Published on: October 26, 2017
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines on myocardial revascularisation
Richard J Jabbour1,2, Nick Curzen3,2
1Cardiology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Insights
UK cardiologists rely on NICE and ESC guidelines for myocardial revascularisation decisions. This review compares NICE recommendations with international guidelines, highlighting subtle differences and their clinical impact.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Guidelines
Background:
- Cardiologists in the UK primarily use National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines.
- These guidelines inform clinical decision-making, particularly for myocardial revascularisation procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically appraise current NICE recommendations for myocardial revascularisation.
- To compare NICE guidelines with other major international cardiology guidelines.
- To analyze the clinical implications of identified differences between guidelines.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of NICE myocardial revascularisation guidelines.
- Review of major international cardiology guidelines.
- Evaluation of evidence base and healthcare system specificities influencing guideline development.
Main Results:
- Significant similarities exist between NICE and international guidelines for myocardial revascularisation.
- Subtle but clinically relevant differences were identified.
- Discrepancies are attributed to varying evidence bases, healthcare system contexts, and cost-effectiveness models used by NICE.
Conclusions:
- While generally aligned, differences in NICE and international myocardial revascularisation guidelines warrant clinical attention.
- Understanding these variations is crucial for optimal patient care and decision-making in cardiology.
- Further analysis of guideline impact across different healthcare settings is recommended.
Abstract:
Cardiologists in the UK predominantly use the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology guidelines to help guide decision-making. This article will appraise the current recommendations from NICE regarding myocardial revascularisation and compare them with other major international guidelines. While there are many similarities, subtle differences exist. These differences arise in part due to the evidence base at time of publication, as well as from the different healthcare systems that they are designed for, and from the cost-effectiveness models that dominate the methodology used by NICE. The clinical implications of the differences between the international guidelines will be analysed.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Myocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

