Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.6K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

172
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
172
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personality traits explain levels of norm compliance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Parenting behaviors over time and their effects on cortical and limbic brain structure in children and young adults.

Developmental cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same author

Deciding for others alters metacognition leading to responsibility aversion.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Trial-by-trial learning signatures in self-reported affect that require introspection and are orthogonal to social choice.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

Decision makers consider all options in choice triplets.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Pre-choice midbrain fluctuations affect self-control in food choice: A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2024
Same journal

How the brain represents a romantic partner: Dissociable roles of the nucleus accumbens and anterior insula.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Predictive processing in time perception: Assessing prediction error minimization in the sub-second range.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

When attention falters: Brain, breathing, and behavioral signals of lapses in interoceptive attention.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Fronto-Parietal EEG asymmetry interactions predict negative attention bias: A secondary data analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Correction: The neural basis of cost-benefit trade-offs in effort investment: a quantitative activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
Same journal

The influence of effort expenditure on the neurophysiological substrates of reward processing in early adolescence.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K

Value certainty and choice confidence are multidimensional constructs that guide decision-making.

Douglas G Lee1,2, Todd A Hare3,4

  • 1School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel. DouglasGLee@gmail.com.

Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
|January 11, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Decision-making certainty and confidence stem from unequally weighted attribute certainties, not simple averages. More important attributes heavily influence metacognitive evaluations and refine during choices.

Keywords:
MetacognitionMultiattribute choiceSubjective value

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.1K
Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

12.2K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Decision-making involves evaluating multiple attributes.
  • Certainty and confidence influence choice behavior.
  • Metacognition plays a role in subjective evaluations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between attribute certainty and overall choice certainty/confidence.
  • To determine how attribute importance affects metacognitive evaluations.
  • To examine how the decision process refines attribute estimates and certainty.

Main Methods:

  • Participants evaluated choice alternatives based on multiple attributes.
  • Statistical modeling was used to assess the weighting of attribute certainties.
  • Attribute estimates and certainty levels were analyzed before and after decision-making.

Main Results:

  • Certainty and confidence are derived from unequally weighted attribute certainties.
  • Highly important attributes are weighted more in metacognitive assessments.
  • The decision process refines attribute estimates and certainty, especially for important attributes.

Conclusions:

  • Decision certainty and confidence are multidimensional, not unidimensional.
  • Metacognitive evaluations reflect the subjective importance of attributes.
  • Attribute-level certainty and its weighting are crucial for understanding choice confidence.