Fungal Nomenclature: Managing Change is the Name of the Game
Sarah E Kidd1,2, Alireza Abdolrasouli3,4, Ferry Hagen5,6,7
1National Mycology Reference Centre, SA Pathology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Abstract:
Fungal species have undergone and continue to undergo significant nomenclatural change, primarily due to the abandonment of dual species nomenclature in 2013 and the widespread application of molecular technologies in taxonomy allowing correction of past classification errors. These have effected numerous name changes concerning medically important species, but by far the group causing most concern are the Candida yeasts. Among common species, Candida krusei, Candida glabrata, Candida guilliermondii, Candida lusitaniae, and Candida rugosa have been changed to Pichia kudriavzevii, Nakaseomyces glabrata, Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Clavispora lusitaniae, and Diutina rugosa, respectively. There are currently no guidelines for microbiology laboratories on implementing changes, and there is ongoing concern that clinicians will dismiss or misinterpret laboratory reports using unfamiliar species names. Here, we have outlined the rationale for name changes across the major groups of clinically important fungi and have provided practical recommendations for managing change.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fungal Phylum Basidiomycota
Overview of Fungi
Fungal Group Zygomycota
Fungal Phylum Ascomycota
Fungal Phylum Microsporidia
Microbial Classification System


