Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Sampling and Pretreatment of Tooth Enamel Carbonate for Stable Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Analysis
Published on: August 15, 2018
The Australopithecus assemblage from Sterkfontein Member 4 (South Africa) and the concept of variation in
Amélie Beaudet1,2,3
1Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract:
Interpreting morphological variation within the early hominin fossil record is particularly challenging. Apart from the fact that there is no absolute threshold for defining species boundaries in palaeontology, the degree of variation related to sexual dimorphism, temporal depth, geographic variation or ontogeny is difficult to appreciate in a fossil taxon mainly represented by fragmentary specimens, and such variation could easily be conflated with taxonomic diversity. One of the most emblematic examples in paleoanthropology is the Australopithecus assemblage from the Sterkfontein Caves in South Africa. Whereas some studies support the presence of multiple Australopithecus species at Sterkfontein, others explore alternative hypotheses to explain the morphological variation within the hominin assemblage. In this review, I briefly summarize the ongoing debates surrounding the interpretation of morphological variation at Sterkfontein Member 4 before exploring two promising avenues that would deserve specific attention in the future, that is, temporal depth and nonhuman primate diversity.
Related Concept Videos
The Fossil Record
01:18Types of Fossilization -II
01:21Fossils
01:17Types of Fossilization - I
01:19How Fossilization Creates Fossils
01:18Evolution Evidence

