Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.1K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

135
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
135
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

218
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
218
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

247
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
247
Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.5K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Classification and Outcomes of 214 Periprosthetic Patellar Fractures in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Design and validation of a biomechanics device for preclinical arthrofibrosis models.

Bone & joint research·2026
Same author

Disparities in Preoperative Weight Loss and Obesity Treatment Before Total Joint Arthroplasty.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Select Femoral Revisions Without an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Demonstrated Excellent 10-Year Survivorship in Over 600 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Surrogate End Points Are Associated With Favorable Results in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Randomized Controlled Trials.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026
Same author

Contemporary Total Hip Arthroplasty for Sequelae of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: 15-Year Outcomes of 165 Cases.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

Propensity Scores: Confounder Adjustment When Comparing Nonrandomized Groups in Orthopaedic Surgery.

Dirk R Larson1, Isabella Zaniletti2, David G Lewallen3

  • 1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

The Journal of Arthroplasty
|January 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Propensity scores help reduce bias in arthroplasty research by balancing patient characteristics in nonrandomized studies. This method minimizes confounding, leading to more reliable comparisons between treatment groups.

Keywords:
biasconfoundinginverse probability of treatmentpropensity scorestatisticstotal joint arthroplasty

More Related Videos

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
09:51

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve

Published on: September 7, 2022

2.7K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Arthroplasty Research
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Many arthroplasty studies utilize nonrandomized, retrospective, registry-based cohorts.
  • These studies often suffer from treatment selection bias and confounding due to differing patient characteristics between groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the creation and application of propensity scores in analyzing nonrandomized studies.
  • To provide methods for minimizing bias and confounding in observational research.

Main Methods:

  • Propensity score creation and balancing techniques are detailed.
  • Multiple application methods for propensity scores in data analysis are described.

Main Results:

  • Propensity scores effectively balance cohort characteristics.
  • This balancing helps mitigate bias and confounding in nonrandomized comparisons.

Conclusions:

  • Propensity scores are a valuable tool for improving the validity of nonrandomized studies in arthroplasty.
  • Utilizing propensity scores enhances the reliability of treatment effect estimations.