High-on-treatment platelet reactivity predicts adverse outcome after carotid artery stenting: A prospective study

G Simonte1, G Guglielmini2, E Falcinelli2

  • 1Unit of Vascular Surgery, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy.

Thrombosis Research
|January 14, 2023
PubMed

Insights

High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) predicts major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Testing HTPR using multiple assays can identify patients at higher risk for vascular events following CAS.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Clinical Pharmacology

Background:

  • High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is a known predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.
  • The predictive value of HTPR in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after carotid artery stenting (CAS) remains largely uninvestigated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the association between HTPR in patients on aspirin plus clopidogrel therapy after CAS and subsequent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study enrolled consecutive patients undergoing CAS.
  • High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was assessed using five laboratory assays prior to CAS.
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) incidence was monitored at 30 days and annually thereafter.

Main Results:

  • Of 300 patients, 47 MACE occurred during a median follow-up of 5.8 years.
  • HTPR detected by multiplate electronic aggregometry (MEA) and VASP phosphorylation assay (VASP) were associated with increased MACE risk.
  • HTPR assessed by three assays (HTPR3) demonstrated a stronger predictive value for vascular events (p=0.002).

Conclusions:

  • High-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) assessed by multiple assays predicts subsequent MACE in patients on DAPT after CAS.
  • Further prospective studies are warranted to determine if platelet function testing-guided therapy improves outcomes compared to standard DAPT in CAS patients.
Abstract