Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Differences in cardiac testing resource utilization using two different risk stratification schemes
Robin J Tyner1, Melanie D Whittington2, Vanessa P Patterson2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine.
Insights
Switching from the TIMI score to the HEART score for chest pain patients in the ED increased cardiac diagnostic testing but reduced length of stay, with no change in major adverse cardiovascular events.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Chest pain is a common emergency department (ED) presentation.
- Risk stratification is crucial for efficient and safe chest pain management.
- The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score and History, EKG, Age, Risk, Troponin (HEART) score are used for risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of transitioning from the TIMI score to the HEART score on healthcare resource utilization in ED chest pain pathways.
- To assess changes in cardiac diagnostic testing (CDT), length of stay (LOS), and 30-day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, quasi-experimental study with difference-in-differences and interrupted time series analyses.
- Evaluated ED patients with chest pain and negative troponin, discharged from the ED.
- Compared outcomes before (TIMI score) and after (HEART score) pathway implementation at an academic medical center and a control site.
Main Results:
- The HEART pathway was associated with increased odds of receiving CDT (OR 2.88).
- A significant reduction in LOS of 34 minutes was observed with the HEART pathway.
- No significant difference in 30-day MACE was found between the TIMI and HEART cohorts.
Conclusions:
- Transitioning to the HEART score pathway resulted in mixed effects on healthcare resource utilization.
- Increased cardiac diagnostic testing and reduced length of stay were observed.
- The HEART score pathway did not increase the risk of 30-day MACE.
Objective:
Assess whether changing an emergency department (ED) chest pain pathway from utilizing the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score for risk stratification to an approach utilizing the History, EKG, Age, Risk, Troponin (HEART) score was associated with reductions in healthcare resource utilization.
Methods:
A retrospective, quasi-experimental study using difference-in-differences and interrupted time series specifications evaluated all ED patients with a chest pain encounter from 8/2015 to 7/2019 at a large academic medical center. We included patients age ≥ 18 with negative troponin testing discharged from the ED. Our standardized care pathway utilized TIMI for risk stratification until 09/2017 and HEART thereafter. We evaluated patients undergoing hospital-based cardiac diagnostic testing (CDT), length of stay (LOS), and 30-day Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) at the intervention site before and after the pathway change and compared these outcomes to a similar control site within the health system for the difference-in-differences specification.
Results:
During the study period, 6.3% (450 of 7117) of patients in the TIMI cohort and 7.2% (546 of 7623) in the HEART cohort among 400,965 total ED visits underwent CDT. In a multivariable analysis, transition to the HEART pathway was associated with greater odds of receiving CDT (odds ratio 2.88 [95% CI 1.21 to 6.86]), a reduction in LOS of 34 min (95% CI 2.2 to 67.6), and no significant difference in 30-day MACE.
Conclusion:
The transition from TIMI to HEART was associated with mixed consequences for healthcare resource utilization, including increased CDT but reduced length of stay.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview