Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
Adjusting for both sequential testing and systematic error in safety surveillance using observational data: Empirical
Martijn J Schuemie1,2, Fan Bu2,3, Akihiko Nishimura4
1Observational Health Data Analytics, Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, New Jersey.
This study introduces empirical calibration to improve medical product safety surveillance. Combining this with maximum sequential probability ratio testing (MaxSPRT) corrects systematic errors in observational data, ensuring reliable safety signal detection.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance
- Biostatistics
- Observational Data Analysis
Background:
- Post-approval safety surveillance using observational healthcare data is crucial for detecting medical product safety issues missed in pre-approval trials.
- Sequential testing methods like maximum sequential probability ratio testing (MaxSPRT) are used to maintain type 1 error rates as data accrue.
- Systematic errors inherent in observational data analyses can cause true type 1 error rates to deviate from nominal levels, even after controlling for confounders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the issue of systematic error in sequential safety surveillance of medical products.
- To propose and evaluate a novel approach combining MaxSPRT with empirical calibration to restore nominal type 1 error rates.
- To demonstrate the method's effectiveness using simulations and real-world electronic health records data.
Main Methods:
- Proposed a novel method integrating empirical calibration with MaxSPRT to address systematic error in sequential testing.
- Empirical calibration infers a probability distribution of systematic error using negative control exposure-outcome pairs.
- The approach calibrates the critical value central to MaxSPRT and was evaluated using simulations and H1N1 vaccination data.
Main Results:
- The combined approach of empirical calibration and MaxSPRT successfully restored nominal type 1 error rates in simulations and real-world data.
- In the H1N1 vaccination example, empirical calibration's impact on adjusting for systematic error was greater than MaxSPRT's impact from sequential testing.
- Both empirical calibration for systematic error and MaxSPRT for sequential testing are essential for reliable safety surveillance.
Conclusions:
- Combining empirical calibration with MaxSPRT is a robust method for accurate post-approval safety surveillance of medical products.
- Empirical calibration is as essential as sequential testing (MaxSPRT) for managing systematic errors in observational data.
- The described method is recommended for performing both systematic error adjustment and sequential testing in safety surveillance.
More Related Videos
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
05:03Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
Published on: December 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Random and Systematic Errors
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis