Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2026
Same author

PRMT5 inhibition impairs Fanconi Anemia pathway-mediated homologous recombination and enhances the antitumor efficacy of Temozolomide in glioblastoma.

Cell death & disease·2026
Same author

Facial nerve pathology: emerging strategies for regeneration and functional restoration.

Journal of materials chemistry. B·2025
Same author

Scar-reducing ionically conductive chitosan bandage: Combining ionic and electrical stimulation for optimal wound healing.

Biomaterials·2025
Same author

Retrospective Clinical Studies in Interventional Oncology: Relevance and Challenges.

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology·2025
Same author

Synergistic effects of electrical and chemical cues with biodegradable scaffolds for large peripheral nerve defect regeneration.

Bioactive materials·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.8K

Smart Orthopedic Biomaterials and Implants.

Jonathon T Intravaia1, Trevon Graham1, Hyun S Kim1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.

Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering
|January 16, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Smart biomaterials and 3D structures offer advanced solutions for bone defect repair by actively engaging with cells and the environment. These innovative materials and strategies enhance bone regeneration and promote osteogenesis for improved orthopedic outcomes.

Keywords:
bioactive implantsmagnetic and electric stimulipiezoelectricsmart biomaterialsstimuli-responsive

More Related Videos

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.1K
Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications
09:56

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

Published on: December 8, 2015

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

12.8K
Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees
14:31

Bioelectric Analyses of an Osseointegrated Intelligent Implant Design System for Amputees

Published on: July 15, 2009

14.1K
Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications
09:56

Fabrication of Mechanically Tunable and Bioactive Metal Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications

Published on: December 8, 2015

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science and Engineering
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Musculoskeletal injuries and bone defects pose significant challenges in orthopedic surgery, often resulting in suboptimal healing.
  • Current bone reconstruction relies on biological grafts and biomaterial-based 3D structures, but limitations in healing persist.
  • Advances in biomaterials science enable the creation of mechanically stable, biodegradable, and bioactive 3D structures for enhanced bone regeneration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize smart biomaterials and methodologies for controlling the tissue healing microenvironment in bone defect repair.
  • To highlight strategies for creating functional bioactive implants using smart biomaterials.
  • To emphasize the role of stimuli-responsive materials in promoting osteogenesis and de novo tissue formation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of recent advances in biomaterials science and engineering for 3D bone-mimicking structures.
  • Discussion of "smart" biomaterials designed for active interaction with stem/progenitor cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM).
  • Exploration of methodologies for applying internal or external stimuli to control the tissue healing microenvironment.

Main Results:

  • Development of intricate 3D structures with improved physicochemical properties for enhanced host tissue interaction and osteogenesis.
  • "Smart" biomaterials demonstrate active engagement with cellular components and the ECM to promote osteogenesis.
  • Strategies for creating functional, bioactive implants capable of directing bone regeneration are being refined.

Conclusions:

  • Smart biomaterials and 3D structures represent a promising frontier in orthopedic surgery for addressing bone defects.
  • Active control over the healing microenvironment using stimuli-responsive materials can significantly improve bone regeneration outcomes.
  • Future research focuses on translating these advanced biomaterials into effective clinical strategies for bone defect repair and regeneration.