Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Renouncing the attempt versus perpetration distinction
1Faculty of Law and Administration and Jagiellonian Centre for Law, Language and Philosophy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
Legal luck challenges criminal law principles by linking responsibility to outcomes, not just intent. Experiments reveal that outcome-dependent defenses, like the renunciation defense, are perceived as unjust.
Area of Science:
- Criminal Law
- Moral Philosophy
- Psychology
Background:
- Criminal law principles emphasize perpetrator's mental state over action outcomes.
- The distinction between criminal attempt and perpetration is challenged by the concept of legal and moral luck.
- The renunciation defense, allowing withdrawal from criminal intent, is often outcome-dependent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the perceived fairness of outcome-dependent legal defenses.
- To examine the implications of outcome luck on the attempt versus perpetration distinction.
- To analyze the justice of the renunciation defense's availability being contingent on the outcome.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a series of experiments with 479 participants.
- Assessed participants' perceptions of justice regarding outcome-dependent legal scenarios.
- Analyzed the relationship between outcome luck and the justification of legal distinctions.
Main Results:
- Participants perceived the outcome dependence of the renunciation defense as unjust.
- Experimental findings highlight inconsistencies in legal responsibility ascriptions.
- The study provides empirical evidence on the subjective experience of legal luck.
Conclusions:
- The availability of the renunciation defense should not be solely outcome-dependent to align with principles of justice.
- Outcome luck significantly impacts the perceived fairness of criminal law, particularly concerning attempt and perpetration.
- Further legal and philosophical consideration is needed to address the influence of luck in criminal responsibility.
Related Concept Videos
Attribution Theory
Fundamental Attribution Error
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Bystander Effect
Conduct Disorder
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation

