Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Payment systems for dialysis and their effects: a scoping review
Zahra Emrani1, Mohammadreza Amiresmaili2, Rajabali Daroudi1
1Department of Health Policy, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
This study reviews dialysis payment systems, finding that retrospective payment systems (RPS) can lead to undertreatment, while prospective payment systems (PPS) offer cost savings but may impact care quality and provider choices. Understanding these dialysis reimbursement methods is key to improving healthcare efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Healthcare Management
- Renal Medicine
Background:
- End-stage renal disease (ESRD) presents a significant healthcare challenge and financial burden.
- Diverse payment methodologies are employed for ESRD management, particularly for dialysis services.
- Identifying and evaluating current dialysis payment systems and their impacts is crucial for optimizing care delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a scoping review of current payment methods for dialysis care.
- To analyze the effects of various reimbursement strategies on healthcare services and patient outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive scoping review was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar (2000-2021).
- Articles were screened based on predefined inclusion criteria, with data extracted using a standardized form.
- Thematic analysis was employed to analyze extracted data on study characteristics and findings.
Main Results:
- Fifty-nine articles were included, predominantly from high-income countries (USA: 64%), with most published after 2011 (66%).
- Key reimbursement methods for dialysis centers included Fee-for-Service (FFS), global budgets, capitation, and Pay-for-Performance (P4P). Nephrologists were primarily reimbursed via FFS, salary, or capitation.
- Payment systems have evolved from Retrospective Payment Systems (RPS) towards Prospective Payment Systems (PPS) and P4P. RPS led to undertreatment of some services, while PPS resulted in cost savings but potential shifts in service costs and impacts on care quality and modality choice.
Conclusions:
- The study offers valuable insights into contemporary dialysis payment systems and their respective consequences.
- Understanding these payment mechanisms can inform strategies for enhancing the quality and efficiency of renal healthcare services.
Related Concept Videos
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care

