Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

766
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
766
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

587
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
587
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

642
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
642
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.3K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.3K
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving01:16

Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving

468
Statically indeterminate problems are those where statics alone can not determine the internal forces or reactions. Consider a structure comprising two cylindrical rods made of steel and brass. These rods are joined at point B and restrained by rigid supports at points A and C. Now, the reactions at points A and C and the deflection at point B are to be determined. This rod structure is classified as statically indeterminate as the structure has more supports than are necessary for maintaining...
468
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

1.9K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Root Canal Obturation Quality in 3D-Printed C-Shaped Canals with Different Filling Techniques.

Acta stomatologica Croatica·2026
Same author

ChemGenXplore: an interactive tool for exploring and analysing chemical genomic data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Analysis of cost differences between comparing Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy (PTED) and Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy (UBE) in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation under Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) payment: a retrospective cohort study.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2025
Same author

Glycyrrhizin alleviates contrast-induced acute kidney injury via inhibiting HMGB1-mediated renal tubular epithelial cells ferroptosis.

Renal failure·2025
Same author

Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in Saudi Arabia: genomic evidence of recent clonal expansion and plasmid-driven resistance dissemination.

Frontiers in microbiology·2025
Same author

Sodium houttuyfonate inhibits the cariogenic virulence of <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> through the downregulation of VicRK two components pathway.

Journal of oral microbiology·2025
Same journal

Modeling the impact of budget limitation on the screening and treatment pathway of HPV-induced precancerous cervical lesions.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2026
Same journal

Modeling the effects of trait-mediated dispersal on coexistence of two species: Competition and non-consumptive predator-prey.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2026
Same journal

A close look at the viral reduction rate in target cell limited models.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2026
Same journal

A stochastic agent-based model for simulating tumor-immune dynamics and evaluating therapeutic strategies.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2026
Same journal

Addressing domain shift via imbalance-aware domain adaptation in embryo development assessment.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2026
Same journal

Effect of drug resistance on an HIV epidemic in heterogeneous populations.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 14, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Runtime verification in uncertain environment based on probabilistic model learning.

Ge Zhou1, Chunzheng Yang2, Peng Lu3

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Hunan, Changsha 410081, China.

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering : MBE
|January 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel runtime verification (RV) method using probabilistic models to predict temporal errors. It offers quantitative correctness predictions, enabling early warnings and system adjustments for improved reliability.

Keywords:
Markov Chainprobabilistic monitorruntime verificationω-automata

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

477
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

659

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 14, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

477
Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

659

Area of Science:

  • Computer Science
  • Software Engineering
  • Formal Methods

Background:

  • Runtime verification (RV) detects temporal errors by analyzing system execution traces, avoiding state explosion.
  • Existing predictive RV methods fail when system models or code are unavailable or environments are uncertain.
  • Traditional RV uses multi-valued logic, lacking accurate quantitative correctness descriptions for inconclusive states.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel runtime verification method for quantitative prediction of temporal property satisfaction.
  • To address limitations of existing RV approaches in scenarios with unavailable models or uncertain environments.
  • To provide early warnings for potential system failures by predicting correctness probabilities.

Main Methods:

  • Learns a probabilistic model (Hidden Markov Model, HMM) from historical traces, transforming it into a Discrete Time Markov Chain (DTMC).
  • Translates the Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) property into a Deterministic Rabin Automaton (DRA).
  • Generates a probabilistic monitor by computing the product of the DTMC and DRA, calculating state probabilities.

Main Results:

  • A probabilistic runtime monitor is generated, providing quantitative predictions of temporal property satisfaction.
  • The method enables early detection of potential violations by monitoring correctness probabilities against a threshold.
  • Experimental validation on a Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAS) simulation platform demonstrates the method's effectiveness.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed RV method offers a robust solution for quantitative correctness prediction, even without system models or in uncertain environments.
  • Probabilistic monitoring allows for proactive system adjustments by providing advance warnings of potential issues.
  • The approach enhances system reliability through early error detection and mitigation strategies.