Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
Usefulness of quantitative bone SPECT/CT for evaluating medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw treatment
Kuniyasu Moridera1, Kazuhiro Kitajima2, Kyohei Yoshikawa1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hyogo Medical University, 1-1 Mukogawa-Cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.
Objective:
For assessment of therapeutic response in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) cases, the clinical usefulness of quantitative bone single-photon computed tomography-computed tomography (SPECT/CT) results was investigated.
Materials And Methods:
Sixteen patients (18 lesions) with a clinical diagnosis of MRONJ underwent bone SPECT/CT scanning before and during/after anti-inflammatory therapy given for 3 or more months. The GI-BONE software package was used to determine standard uptake values (SUVs), including maximum (SUVmax), peak (SUVpeak), and mean (SUVmean), and metabolic bone volume (MBV) and also total bone uptake (TBU). In both responders (downstage) and non-responders (upstage or no change), differences in quantitative values between the first and second SPECT/CT examinations were analyzed using a Wilcoxon test.
Results:
Following therapy, significant reductions in SUVmax, SUVpeak, SUVmean, MBV and TBU values for 11 lesions were noted in the responders after therapy (p = 0.003, p = 0.006, p = 0.004, p = 0.003, and p = 0.002, respectively). On the other hand, those for the seven lesions in the non-responder group were not significantly different (p = 0.17, p = 0.16, p = 0.26, p = 0.96, and p = 0.12, respectively). Results for SUVmax change showed sensitivity and specificity values of 45.5% and 85.7%, respectively, for differentiating responders from non-responders, with - 37.3% the optimal cutoff value. Those for MBV change were 72.7 and 85.7%, respectively, with - 29.4% the optimal cutoff value. Those for TBU change were 81.8% and 85.7%, respectively, with - 36.3% the optimal cutoff value.
Conclusion:
The present findings showed that therapeutic response in MRONJ cases could be determined by use of quantitative SUV, MBV, and TBU values based on bone SPECT/CT findings.
