Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

09:55
Bridging the Technology Divide in the COVID-19 Era: Using Virtual Outreach to Expose Middle and High School Students to Imaging Technology
Published on: September 28, 2022
1.7K
Understanding the Role of Urology Practice Organization and Racial Composition in Prostate Cancer Treatment
Nnenaya Agochukwu-Mmonu1,2, Yongmei Qin3, Samuel Kaufman3
1Department of Urology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY.
JCO Oncology Practice
|January 19, 2023
Summary
Black men with prostate cancer receive less definitive treatment, even with Medicare. Practice segregation and structural racism contribute to these disparities, requiring interventions.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Urology
- Health Disparities
Background:
- Black men face higher prostate cancer risks and mortality but receive less definitive treatment.
- Structural factors influencing prostate cancer treatment disparities remain largely unknown.
- Understanding practice organization and racial composition is crucial for actionable insights.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine associations between urology practice organization, racial composition, and prostate cancer treatment patterns.
- To investigate treatment disparities among Medicare beneficiaries with incident prostate cancer.
- To identify structural factors contributing to racial disparities in prostate cancer care.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a 20% national Medicare data sample (2010-2016) for beneficiaries diagnosed with prostate cancer.
- Linked patients to urology practices based on primary urologist and practice tax identification numbers.
- Grouped practices by proportion of Black patients and employed multilevel mixed-effects models for analysis.
Main Results:
- Identified 54,443 patients across 4,194 practices; 87% White, 9% Black.
- Practices with higher Black patient proportions served lower socioeconomic status patients with higher comorbidity.
- Black patients had lower odds of definitive therapy (aOR 0.87) and lower predicted treatment probability (66% vs. 69% for White patients).
Conclusions:
- Significant prostate cancer treatment disparities persist among Black Medicare beneficiaries despite coverage.
- Findings suggest adverse effects of practice segregation and structural racism on treatment access.
- Multilevel interventions are necessary to address these identified disparities in prostate cancer care.

