Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Aggravation of Myocardial Ischemia upon Particulate Matter Exposure in Atherosclerosis Animal Model
Published on: December 10, 2021
Long-term exposure to fine particulate matter modifies the association between physical activity and the risk of
Yuchen Zhao1, Qian Guo1, Jiahao Zhao1
1School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
Abstract:
The trade-off between the potentially detrimental effects of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and the benefits of physical activity (PA) is unclear. We aimed to explore the independent and interaction effects between long-term PM2.5 exposure and PA on blood pressure (BP) and hypertension. A total of 8704 adults (≥45 years) without hypertension at baseline in a nationwide cohort of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) were followed from 2011 to 2015. The participants were selected using a four-stage, stratified, and cluster sampling procedure. The annual PM2.5 concentrations at the residential address were estimated from a two-stage machine learning model with a 10 km × 10 km resolution. A standard questionnaire collected information on PA and potential confounders, and metabolic equivalents (MET·h/wk), which combined frequency, intensity, and duration information, were used to assess PA levels. We adopted mixed-effects regression models to explore the independent and interaction effects between long-term PM2.5 exposure and PA on BP and risk of hypertension. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased by -0.84 mmHg (95% CI: -1.34, -0.34) per an IQR (interquartile range, 175.5 MET·h/wk) increase in PA, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) decreased by -0.42 mmHg (95% CI: -0.76, -0.07). Each IQR (36.1 μg/m3) increment in PM2.5 was associated with 0.48 mmHg (95% CI: -0.24, 1.20) in SBP and -0.02 mmHg (95% CI: -0.44, 0.39) in DBP. PM2.5 showed an elevated effect with risks of hypertension (odds ratio, OR = 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03), while PA showed the inverse result (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97, 0.99). Interaction analyses indicated PA maintained the beneficial effects on BP, but the negative association was attenuated, accompanied by the increase of PM2.5. PA decreased the BP and hypertension risks, while PM2.5 showed the opposite results. PM2.5 attenuated the beneficial effects of PA on BP and modified the association between PA and the risk of hypertension.
More Related Videos
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
05:18Measuring Carbon Content in Airway Macrophages Exposed to Carbon-Containing Particulate Matters
Published on: July 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension and Regulation of Blood Pressure
01:20Health Hazards of Air Pollution
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Hypertension I: Introduction
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors: