Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Simulator Training for Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published on: May 6, 2020
Relationship between selection criteria and trainee performance in medical specialty training: A retrospective
Chali Jiang1, Brett O'Neill1, Haley Bennett1
1The Australasian College of Dermatologists, Rhodes, New South Wales, Australia.
Background:
Investigation of tools used for candidate selection as predictors of future performance in medical education has been primarily undertaken within the undergraduate setting, but little is known about the selection to medical specialist programs. This retrospective longitudinal study aims to explore correlations between selection tools and the performance of trainees enrolled in the Australasian College of Dermatologists (ACD), the accredited specialist medical college for training in dermatology in Australia.
Methods:
Data were collected from consecutive cohorts of ACD trainees commencing from 2007 to 2015. Predictive variables were trainee demographics and selection tools (prior academic qualification; research experience; clinical experience; curriculum vitae [CV] rating; interview scores). The outcome variables were exam performance. First Year ([Pharmacology and Clinical Sciences] and Fellowship Exam [Written, Clinical, and Overall Score]). Statistical analyses included: descriptive statistics summaries; bivariate correlation of selection criteria and demographic data with exam performance; and linear regression analysis to identify predictors of exam performance.
Results:
Demographic analysis (N = 172) showed that 64% of trainees were female, the average age was 30.5 years (± 3.47) and trainees living in high socioeconomic status (SES) areas were over-represented. Using Pearson correlation analysis, interview scores were significantly positively correlated with First Year Pharmacology results (p = 0.018), Fellowship Written results (p = 0.002), and Fellowship Overall Scores (p = 0.006). First Year Pharmacology Exam performance was most highly correlated with Fellowship Exam performance (p = 0.000). No association was identified between exam performance and gender, SES, prior academic qualification, research experience or CV rating. Linear regression analysis showed that interview score (p = 0.012), entry age (p = 0.026) and First Year Pharmacology score (p = 0.002) were predictors of Fellowship exam performance.
Conclusion:
These results suggest that the comprehensive selection tools used by ACD are effective, with interviews being a highly valid tool linked to exam performance. These findings have important practical implications for assessing the selection process in specialist dermatology training.
More Related Videos
07:35Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
Dose-Response Relationship: Selectivity and Specificity
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...
Frequency-dependent Selection