Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
The impact of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in aortic stenosis
Dorien Laenens1, Jan Stassen1, Xavier Galloo1
1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Insights
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is linked to reduced survival. However, this association disappears when accounting for left ventricular diastolic function, suggesting diastolic function is a key factor.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Prognostics
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) frequently coexist in patients.
- While AF's prognostic value in AS is studied, left ventricular (LV) diastolic function's role is less explored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic impact of AF in patients with AS.
- To adjust for LV diastolic function when evaluating AF's effect on outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Patients with newly diagnosed significant AS were categorized by AF history.
- All-cause mortality was the primary endpoint, analyzed using Cox regression.
- LV diastolic function parameters (indexed left atrial volume, E/e') were used for adjustment.
Main Results:
- The study included 2849 AS patients (24.1% with AF history).
- Ten-year mortality was higher in patients with AF (46.8%) versus sinus rhythm (36.8%).
- AF was independently associated with mortality but lost significance after correcting for LV diastolic function markers.
Conclusions:
- Patients with AS and AF exhibit decreased survival compared to those in sinus rhythm.
- LV diastolic function markers (indexed left atrial volume, E/e') mediate the prognostic impact of AF in AS.
- AF is not an independent predictor of mortality in AS when LV diastolic function is considered.
Background:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) and aortic stenosis (AS) are both highly prevalent and often coexist. Various studies have focused on the prognostic value of AF in patients with AS, but rarely considered left ventricular (LV) diastolic function as a prognostic factor.
Objective:
To evaluate the prognostic impact of AF in patients with AS while correcting for LV diastolic function.
Methods:
Patients with first diagnosis of significant AS were selected and stratified according to history of AF. The endpoint was all-cause mortality.
Results:
In total, 2849 patients with significant AS (mean age 72 ± 12 years, 54.8% men) were evaluated, and 686 (24.1%) had a history of AF. During a median follow-up of 60 (30-97) months, 1182 (41.5%) patients died. Ten-year mortality rate in patients with AF was 46.8% compared to 36.8% in patients with sinus rhythm (SR) (log-rank P < 0.001). On univariable (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.25-1.62; P < 0.001) and multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.38; P = 0.026), AF was independently associated with mortality. However, when correcting for indexed left atrial volume, E/e' or both, AF was no longer independently associated with all-cause mortality.
Conclusion:
Patients with significant AS and AF have a reduced survival as compared to patients with SR. Nonetheless, when correcting for markers of LV diastolic function, AF was not independently associated with outcomes in patients with significant AS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

