Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

40.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.3K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

35.0K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
35.0K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.8K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.8K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.3K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.3K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

33.0K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
33.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Information architectures: a framework for understanding socio-technical systems.

Npj complexity·2025
Same author

Little evidence that posttraumatic stress is associated with diurnal hormone dysregulation in Turkana pastoralists.

Evolution, medicine, and public health·2025
Same author

Historical myths define group boundaries: A mathematical sketch and evidence from Ukraine.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Combat stress in a small-scale society suggests divergent evolutionary roots for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same author

Integrating models of cognition and culture will require a bit more math.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2020
Same author

An evolutionary theory of large-scale human warfare: Group-structured cultural selection.

Evolutionary anthropology·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 13, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K

Constraints on cooperation shape hierarchical versus distributed structure in human groups.

Matthew R Zefferman1,2

  • 1National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA. mrzeffer@nps.edu.

Scientific Reports
|January 20, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Human group organization, whether hierarchical or distributed, depends on cooperation costs. Hierarchical structures are favored when punishment is cheap, while distributed structures emerge when monitoring is cheap and punishment is costly.

More Related Videos

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.1K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 13, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.4K
A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats
10:29

A Complex Diving-For-Food Task to Investigate Social Organization and Interactions in Rats

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.1K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Economics
  • Anthropology

Background:

  • Human groups exhibit diverse organizational structures, including hierarchical and distributed forms.
  • The reasons for the prevalence of one structure over another in different domains (economic, political, military) remain unclear.
  • Cooperation within human groups is often sustained through monitoring and punishment mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explain the emergence and prevalence of hierarchical versus distributed human group organizations.
  • To investigate the role of monitoring and punishment costs in shaping group structures.
  • To formalize a hypothesis linking cooperation constraints to organizational forms.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a formal model of cooperation in public goods games.
  • Simulation of monitoring and punishment networks within groups.
  • Analysis of the impact of varying monitoring and punishment costs on optimal network structures.

Main Results:

  • When punishment costs are high and monitoring costs are low, distributed monitoring and punishment networks are socially optimal.
  • The size of distributed networks is limited by monitoring costs.
  • When punishment costs are low, hierarchical networks are socially optimal, with monitoring costs influencing the number of supervision levels.

Conclusions:

  • The costs associated with monitoring and punishment are key determinants of human group organizational structure.
  • Hierarchical organizations are favored in low-punishment-cost environments, while distributed organizations are optimal in high-punishment-cost, low-monitoring-cost settings.
  • Technological advancements reducing monitoring costs may facilitate the growth of large-scale distributed organizations.