Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

10:17
Guidelines and Experience Using Imaging Biomarker Explorer IBEX for Radiomics
Published on: January 8, 2018
13.3K
Robustness of Radiomic Features: Two-Dimensional versus Three-Dimensional MRI-Based Feature Reproducibility in
Narumol Sudjai1, Palanan Siriwanarangsun2, Nittaya Lektrakul2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|January 21, 2023
Summary
Three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation offers higher reproducibility for radiomic features in lipomatous soft-tissue tumors compared to two-dimensional (2D) methods. This suggests 3D segmentation is preferable for robust feature extraction in radiomics.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Oncology
Background:
- Radiomic features derived from medical imaging hold potential for non-invasive tumor characterization.
- Assessing the reproducibility of these features is crucial for their clinical translation.
- Lipomatous soft-tissue tumors present a unique challenge for imaging-based analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the intra- and inter-observer variability of radiomic features extracted from two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in lipomatous soft-tissue tumors.
- To evaluate the impact of segmentation method (2D vs. 3D) on feature reproducibility, robustness, and the diagnostic performance of machine learning models.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of MRI scans from patients with histopathologically confirmed lipomatous soft-tissue tumors.
- Manual tumor segmentation was performed by two observers on both 2D and 3D MRI datasets.
- Radiomic features were extracted, and their reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.75).
- Machine learning models were trained using reproducible features to evaluate diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Main Results:
- Three-dimensional (3D) segmentation yielded a significantly higher rate of reproducible radiomic features (58.9%) compared to two-dimensional (2D) segmentation (37.6%).
- A greater proportion of 3D features exhibited moderate-to-high robustness, whereas 40.9% of 2D features had low robustness.
- Machine learning models showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (90% for 3D vs. 88% for 2D), but 3D segmentation achieved higher sensitivity (83% vs. 75%) with equal specificity (100%).
Conclusions:
- Both 2D and 3D MRI-based radiomic features are reproducible for lipomatous soft-tissue tumors.
- Three-dimensional (3D) contour-focused segmentation demonstrates superior performance in terms of stable feature rate and feature robustness.
- The findings support the selection of 3D segmentation for enhanced feature extraction and potentially improved diagnostic performance in radiomic studies of these tumors.
Keywords:
T1-weighted magnetic-resonance imagingfeature reproducibilitylipomatous soft-tissue tumorsradiomicstumor segmentation
