Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Proof-of-Concept for Gas-Entrapping Membranes Derived from Water-Loving SiO2/Si/SiO2 Wafers for Green Desalination
Published on: March 1, 2020
A Comparison between Various Polymeric Membranes for Oily Wastewater Treatment via Membrane Distillation Process
Dharshini Mohanadas1, Puteri Mimie Isma Nordin1, Rosiah Rohani1,2
1Department of Chemical & Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, UKM, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Researchers identified the best membranes for treating oily wastewater (OW) using membrane distillation (MD) and pressure-driven filtration. The XT and MT ultrafiltration membranes showed superior oil removal (>99%), though MD experienced higher flux reduction due to wetting.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science and Engineering
- Materials Science
- Chemical Engineering
Background:
- Oily wastewater (OW) poses significant environmental and health risks, necessitating advanced treatment solutions.
- Membrane technology, particularly membrane distillation (MD), offers high pollutant rejection but faces challenges with commercial membrane fouling.
- Effective treatment requires identifying membranes with optimal separation performance and fouling resistance for OW.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare the separation performance of various ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) membranes for treating oily wastewater.
- To assess the efficacy of membrane pressure-filtration versus membrane distillation (MD) in removing oil contaminants.
- To identify membranes with superior performance and investigate fouling and wetting characteristics for optimized OW treatment.
Main Methods:
- Tested six UF and NF membranes (NFS, NFX, XT, MT, GC, FILMTEC) for oily wastewater (100 ppm) separation performance.
- Compared pressure-driven membrane filtration and MD for long-term treatment (2 hours, 5000 ppm oil concentration) using XT and MT membranes.
- Analyzed membrane flux, oil removal rates, contact angles, and fouling/wetting behavior.
Main Results:
- XT and MT UF membranes exhibited the best performance, with high flux and oil removal rates (>99% for XT).
- MD showed higher oil removal efficiency but experienced significant flux reduction (82%) compared to membrane pressure-filtration (25%).
- Hydrophilic XT and MT membranes demonstrated fouling resistance, but MD encountered wetting issues, leading to flux reduction.
Conclusions:
- The XT and MT UF membranes are promising for oily wastewater treatment, with XT achieving >99% oil removal.
- While MD offers high rejection, membrane wetting and significant flux reduction necessitate further investigation and membrane modification.
- Developing modified dual-layer membranes with tailored hydrophobic/hydrophilic properties is crucial for enhancing anti-fouling and anti-wetting capabilities in MD treatment of oily wastewater.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Detergent Purification of Membrane Proteins
Membrane Fluidity
Distillation: Vapor–Liquid Equilibria

