Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
Prediction of conduction disturbances in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Valérie Pavlicek1, Felix Mahfoud2, Katharina Bubel3
1Klinik Für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie Und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str, 66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany. valerie.pavlicek@uks.eu.
Insights
New-onset left bundle branch block (BBB) and diabetes mellitus predict high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Electrophysiologic studies are not needed to identify patients at risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Electrophysiology
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a common procedure for severe aortic stenosis.
- Intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICA), including left bundle branch block (BBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB), are known complications of TAVR.
- Predicting and managing these conduction disturbances is crucial for patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical, anatomical, procedural, and electrophysiological predictors of ICA after TAVR.
- Specifically, to investigate factors predicting HAVB requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation.
- To evaluate the utility of electrophysiologic studies (EPS) in predicting HAVB post-TAVR.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study of 203 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR with either self-expanding or balloon-expanding valves.
- Assessment of clinical and anatomical parameters, including membranous septum length and implantation depth.
- Measurement of His-ventricular interval (HVi) before and after TAVR.
- Analysis of 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG) at baseline and follow-up (3 and 30 days) for ICA detection.
Main Results:
- TAVR caused significant infranodal conduction prolongation in all patients.
- Fifteen patients (7%) developed HAVB requiring PPM, and 63 patients (31%) developed ICA within 30 days.
- Pre-existing BBB, new-onset left BBB, and diabetes mellitus were independent predictors of HAVB requiring PPM. HVi prolongation was not predictive.
Conclusions:
- New-onset left BBB and diabetes mellitus are independent predictors of HAVB requiring PPM after TAVR.
- These factors can help identify patients at higher risk for conduction disturbances.
- Electrophysiologic studies are not specific or predictive for HAVB and can be omitted.
Aim:
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) can cause intraventricular conduction disturbances (ICA), particularly left bundle branch block (BBB) and high-degree atrioventricular block (HAVB). The aim of this study was to investigate clinical, anatomical, procedural, and electrophysiological parameters predicting ICA after TAVR.
Methods:
Patients with severe aortic stenosis (n = 203) without pacing devices undergoing TAVR with a self-expanding (n = 103) or balloon-expanding (n = 100) valve were enrolled. Clinical and anatomical parameters, such as length of the membranous septum (MS) and implantation depth, were assessed. His-ventricular interval (HVi) before and after implantation was determined. 12-lead-electrocardiograms (ECG) before, during and after 3 and 30 days after TAVR were analyzed for detection of any ICA.
Results:
Among 203 consecutive patients (aortic valve area 0.78 ± 0.18 cm2, age 80 ± 6 years, 54% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 52 ± 10%), TAVR led to a significant prolongation of infranodal conduction in all patients from 49 ± 10 ms to 59 ± 16 ms (p = 0.01). The HVi prolongation was independent of valve types, occurrence of HAVB or ICA. Fifteen patients (7%) developed HAVB requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and 63 patients (31%) developed ICA within 30 days. Pre-existing BBB (OR 11.64; 95% CI 2.87-47.20; p = 0.001), new-onset left BBB (OR 15.72; 95% CI 3.05-81.03; p = 0.001), and diabetes mellitus (OR 3.88; 95% CI 1.30-15.99; p = 0.02) independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM. Neither pre-existing right BBB, a prolonged postHVi, increases in PR duration, any of the TAVR implantation procedural and anatomic nor echocardiographic characteristics were predictive for later HAVB.
Conclusions:
New-onset left BBB and diabetes mellitus independently predicted HAVB requiring PPM after TAVR and helped to identify patients at risk. Electrophysiologic study (EPS) of atrioventricular conduction was neither specific nor predictive of HAVB and can be skipped.
Trial Registration Number:
NCT04128384 ( https://www.
Clinicaltrials:
gov ).
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

