Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

07:45
The Use of Mixed Reality in Custom-Made Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A First Case Report
Published on: August 4, 2022
3.4K
Radiological positioning of a proximal interphalangeal joint resurfacing implant: Reliability and functional outcomes
E Bodmer1, F Fiumedinisi2, M Marks3
1Clinic for Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital of Zug, Landhausstrasse 11, 6340 Baar, Switzerland; Clinic for Hand and Plastic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Spitalstrasse, 6000 Lucerne 16, Switzerland.
Hand Surgery & Rehabilitation
|January 21, 2023
Summary
Radiographic measurements for the CapFlex-PIP implant in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint were unreliable. Implant position did not correlate with patient outcomes, suggesting measurements need improvement or position has minimal impact.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Radiology
- Medical device evaluation
Background:
- Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is a common procedure.
- Accurate assessment of implant positioning is crucial for optimal outcomes.
- Current methods for quantifying implant position may lack reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define and assess the reliability of radiological measurements for CapFlex-PIP implant positioning.
- To investigate the correlation between implant position and patient outcomes (range of motion, function, pain) one year post-surgery.
Main Methods:
- Development of 7 radiographic measurements for proximal and distal CapFlex-PIP components.
- Analysis of 63 postoperative radiographs by two independent surgeons.
- Calculation of inter-rater reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
- Correlation analysis (Spearman's) between measurements and clinical outcomes (ROM, MHQ, pain).
Main Results:
- Only one of the seven measurements demonstrated good inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.89).
- Other measurements showed poor to moderate reliability (ICC 0.34-0.69).
- No significant correlations were found between implant position measurements and ROM, MHQ scores, or pain (correlation coefficients 0.00-0.31).
Conclusions:
- Radiographic quantification of CapFlex-PIP implant position is unreliable.
- The lack of correlation suggests either measurement unreliability or minimal influence of implant position on outcomes.
- Further research is needed to refine measurement techniques or confirm the limited impact of implant positioning.
Keywords:
ArthroplastieArthroplastyCapFlex-PIPDoigtFingerImplant de resurfaçagePositionRadiological assessmentResurfacing implantÉvaluation radiologique
