Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Temporary ventricular assist device support with a catheter-based axial pump: Changing the paradigm at a pediatric
Sebastian C Tume1, Andres A Fuentes-Baldemar2, Marc Anders1
1Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex.
Insights
Pediatric patients needing mechanical circulatory support showed excellent survival rates using catheter-based axial pumps. This study highlights the effectiveness of Impella devices in treating pediatric heart failure and cardiogenic shock.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Mechanical Circulatory Support
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Acute decompensated heart failure and cardiogenic shock are critical conditions in children.
- Catheter-based axial pump support offers a potential solution for pediatric patients with severe heart failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes of pediatric patients receiving catheter-based axial pump support.
- To assess survival rates and adverse events associated with Impella device use in children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study of 37 pediatric encounters requiring catheter-based axial pump support (October 2014 - February 2022).
- Primary outcome: bridge-to-recovery, bridge-to-durable VAD, bridge-to-transplant, or death at 6 months post-explantation.
- Adverse events classified using Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support criteria.
Main Results:
- 37 encounters involved 43 Impella device implantations in pediatric patients.
- Predominant indications: graft failure/rejection (43%), cardiomyopathy (19%), refractory arrhythmia (16%).
- 6-month outcomes: 58% bridge-to-recovery, 14% bridge-to-durable VAD, 14% bridge-to-transplant, 14% death.
Conclusions:
- Catheter-based axial pump support in children demonstrates excellent 1- and 6-month survival.
- The Impella device offers an acceptable adverse event profile for pediatric mechanical circulatory support.
- This single-center experience represents the largest to date for pediatric Impella use.
Objective:
We report the largest pediatric single-center experience with an Impella (Abiomed Inc) catheter-based axial pump support.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with acute decompensated heart failure or cardiogenic shock requiring catheter-based axial pump support between October 2014 and February 2022. The primary outcome per individual encounter (hospital admission) was defined as bridge-to-recovery, bridge-to-durable ventricular assist device support, bridge-to-cardiac transplantation, or death at 6 months after catheter-based axial pump explantation. Adverse events were defined according to the Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support criteria.
Results:
Our final study cohort included 37 encounters with 43 catheter-based axial pump implantations. A single catheter-based axial pump device was used for support in 33 encounters (89%), with 2 catheter-based axial pump devices used in 3 (8%) separate encounters and 3 catheter-based axial pump devices used in 1 (3%) encounter. The median [range] age, weight, and body surface area at implantation were 16.8 [6.9-42.8] years, 61.1 [23.1-123.8] kg, and 1.7 [0.8-2.5] m2, respectively. The predominant causes of circulatory failure were graft failure/rejection in 16 patients (43%), followed by cardiomyopathy in 7 patients (19%), arrhythmia refractory to medical therapies in 6 patients (16%), myocarditis/endocarditis in 4 patients (11%), and heart failure due to congenital heart disease in 4 patients (11%). Competing outcomes analysis showed a positive outcome with bridge-to-recovery in 58%, bridge-to-durable VAD support in 14%, and bridge-to-cardiac transplantation in 14% at 6 months. Fourteen percent of encounters resulted in death at 6 months.
Conclusions:
We demonstrate that catheter-based axial pump support in children results in excellent 1- and 6-month survival with an acceptable adverse event profile.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

