Impact of genetically predicted atrial fibrillation on cancer risks: A large cardio-oncology Mendelian randomization...

Increasing incidences of both atrial fibrillation (AF) and cancer have been observed in recent years. However, the casual association of both serious conditions has been scarcely evaluated and is considered to be a blank slate in cardio-oncology. Thus, we introduced Mendelian randomization (MR) methods to estimate the effects of AF on cancer risks.

We performed univariable and multivariable two-sample MR analyses to evaluate the effects of AF on the risk of 19 site-specific types of cancer. This MR study was conducted based on 111 independent AF-associated genetic instruments from genome-wide association studies and summarized-level data from corresponding cancer consortia. Multiple sensitivity analyses, including the leave-one-out analysis, MR-Egger regression, and MR-PRESSO tests, were further performed to examine the potential directional pleiotropic effects. Functional annotation was performed for common differentially expressed genes of AF and prostate cancer (PCA).

A total of 6,777,155 European-descent people, including 533,725 cases and 6,243,430 controls, were included in the present MR analysis. Univariable MR analyses demonstrated a causal effect of AF on the incidence of PCA [odds ratio (OR): 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-0.99, p = 0.01], and the causal effect remained significant (OR: 0.65; 95% CI 0.47-0.90, p = 0.01) after adjusting for potential confounders through the multivariable MR approach. However, no casual associations between AF and the other 18 site-specific cancer risks were observed (all p-values were > 0.05). The consistency of outcomes across complementary sensitivity MR methods further supported the causality. The functional analysis emphasized the essential role of antioxidant and xenobiotic catabolic processes in AF and PCA.

Contrary to the findings of several previous observational studies, our comprehensive MR analyses did not corroborate a causal role for AF in increasing the risk of various types of cancer. They did, however, demonstrate that AF may decrease the risk of PCA. Studies from larger sample sizes and individuals with different ethnic backgrounds are required to further support our conclusions.