Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Personalized Peptide Arrays for Detection of HLA Alloantibodies in Organ Transplantation
Published on: September 6, 2017
Prozone phenomenon in pretransplant testing: An interesting conundrum involving solid-phase and cell-based assays
Parvind Singh1, Aseem Kumar Tiwari2, Vikash Chandra Mishra1
1Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India.
The prozone effect, a cause of false-negative results in antibody testing, significantly impacts cell-based assays more than solid-phase assays. This finding is crucial for accurate human leukocyte antigen antibody detection in solid organ transplantation.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Transplantation Science
Background:
- Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility is critical for solid organ transplantation success.
- Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) are a major barrier to transplantation and require accurate detection.
- Existing cell-based and HLA bead-based assays for DSA identification have limitations, including the prozone effect, which can lead to false-negative results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of the prozone phenomenon on cell-based assays (flow cytometric cross-match, FCXM) and HLA bead-based assays (panel reactive antibodies, PRA).
- To compare the utility of these assays in histocompatibility testing under prozone conditions.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using known positive samples, pooled sera, and commercially available positive control sera.
- Flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM) and HLA bead-based panel reactive antibody (PRA) assays were performed.
- Serial dilutions of pooled sera and positive concoctions were analyzed to assess the prozone effect.
Main Results:
- Pooled sera showed unexpected median fluorescence intensity (MFI) in FCXM, while PRA indicated high positivity.
- The prozone effect caused declining MFI in FCXM with positive concoctions, whereas PRA values remained stable.
- Diluting samples revealed a sudden increase in FCXM MFI, peaking at 1:4 dilution, while PRA values remained consistently high.
Conclusions:
- Cell-based assays, specifically FCXM, are more susceptible to the prozone effect, leading to potential false-negative results.
- Solid-phase assays, such as flow PRA, demonstrate resistance to the prozone effect, offering greater reliability in DSA detection.
- These findings highlight the differential impact of the prozone phenomenon on various assay types used in histocompatibility testing.
More Related Videos
11:55Induction of Alloantigen-specific Anergy in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells by Alloantigen Stimulation with Co-stimulatory Signal Blockade
Published on: March 14, 2011
10:11Using Quantitative Real-time PCR to Determine Donor Cell Engraftment in a Competitive Murine Bone Marrow Transplantation Model
Published on: March 7, 2013