Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Effects of systematic data reduction on trend estimation from German registration trials
Jens Hartung1, Friedrich Laidig2, Hans-Peter Piepho2
1Institut for Crop Science, Biostatistics Unit, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany. jens.hartung@uni-hohenheim.de.
Using all data in VCU trials provides unbiased estimates of genetic trends. Excluding data from genotypes tested for fewer than three years can bias trend estimations, particularly in wheat breeding.
Area of Science:
- Agricultural Science
- Plant Breeding
- Quantitative Genetics
Background:
- Variety trials evaluating a variety's value for cultivation and use (VCU) are crucial for assessing genetic progress in crops.
- VCU datasets include registered varieties and genotypes that did not achieve registration, forming distinct post-breeding and post-registration populations.
- Excluding data from genotypes not reaching registration can introduce bias into genetic trend estimations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of data exclusion (informative drop-out) on genetic and non-genetic trend estimations in wheat breeding.
- To determine if VCU trial data, when fully utilized, provides unbiased estimates of post-breeding trends.
- To quantify the bias introduced by restricting data to only registered varieties or those tested for a minimum duration.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of historical German winter wheat VCU trial data.
- Simulation study designed to mimic the structure of VCU trials and assess the effect of data exclusion.
- Comparison of trend estimates derived from complete VCU datasets versus restricted datasets (e.g., genotypes tested for ≥3 years).
Main Results:
- When all VCU trial data was used, unbiased estimates of post-breeding trends were obtained, even when simulating zero true trends.
- Restricting data to genotypes tested for at least three years resulted in biased estimates: a positive genetic trend (+0.11 dt ha⁻¹ year⁻¹) and a negative non-genetic trend (-0.11 dt ha⁻¹ year⁻¹).
- The observed bias increased with higher genotype-by-year variance and was mitigated by random data selection.
Conclusions:
- VCU trials offer unbiased estimates of post-breeding trends when all available data is incorporated.
- Excluding data from genotypes tested for shorter periods (e.g., up to two years) can lead to significant biases in trend estimations.
- The findings highlight the importance of utilizing complete VCU datasets to accurately assess genetic gains and understand yield improvements in wheat breeding.
More Related Videos
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Censoring Survival Data
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...