Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Expensive Drug Prices for Rare Cancers: Are Patients Truly Benefitting?
Kristina Jenei1, Bishal Gyawali2
1Research Associate, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
Abstract:
Cancer medicines comprise the largest proportion of expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs). The US Orphan Drug Act (ODA) (Office of Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services 2001) encourages pharmaceutical manufacturers to develop medicines for rare diseases through a range of financial incentives, which has shifted the development of cancer medicines to rare cancer subtypes. Although certain medicines approved through the ODA have revolutionized cancer treatment, only half demonstrate added therapeutic benefit compared to existing alternatives. Canadian regulators should ensure that cancer medicines that receive fast-track approval through the Health Canada Notice of Compliance with conditions offer benefit to Canadian patients. Furthermore, payers might engage in methods for reassessment and renegotiations over the medicines' lifespan.
Insights
Cancer medicines for rare diseases are often expensive. Regulators must ensure these drugs provide real patient benefit, especially those fast-tracked for approval.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Health Policy
Background:
- Cancer medicines represent a significant portion of expensive drugs for rare diseases (EDRDs).
- The US Orphan Drug Act (ODA) incentivizes development for rare diseases, shifting focus to rare cancer subtypes.
- While some ODA-approved medicines have transformed cancer care, many lack demonstrated added therapeutic benefit over existing treatments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the therapeutic benefit of cancer medicines approved via the US Orphan Drug Act.
- To inform Canadian regulatory and payer practices regarding fast-tracked cancer medicines.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of cancer medicines approved through the US Orphan Drug Act.
- Review of regulatory approval pathways and therapeutic benefit assessments.
Main Results:
- Approximately half of the cancer medicines approved via the ODA do not show added therapeutic benefit compared to current alternatives.
- The ODA has successfully redirected cancer medicine development towards rare subtypes.
Conclusions:
- Canadian regulators must ensure that fast-tracked cancer medicines provide tangible benefits to patients.
- Payers should consider ongoing reassessment and renegotiation strategies for these high-cost medications throughout their lifecycle.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Prescription, Nonprescription and Orphan Drugs
The misuse and addiction to prescription drugs is a growing problem that can affect people of all age groups, specifically teenagers. This can happen when prescription medications are used in ways not intended by the prescriber, such as taking someone else's prescription or using medication for...

