Preschool Pain Management Program for Young Children with Sickle Cell Disease: A Pre-Post Feasibility Study

Julia D Johnston1, Jeffrey Schatz1, Sarah E Bills1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, USA.

Insights

An online pain management program for caregivers of children with sickle cell disease (SCD) was feasible and acceptable. Further evaluation of a modified program is recommended to address implementation barriers and assess effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Hematology
  • Pain Management
  • Digital Health Interventions

Background:

  • Vaso-occlusive pain crises are common in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), often starting in early childhood.
  • Caregivers require effective strategies to manage pain and support adaptive coping in young children with SCD.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and usefulness of an online pain management intervention for caregivers of preschool-aged children with SCD.
  • To evaluate the suitability of outcome measures for assessing changes in caregiver pain catastrophizing and responses to their child's pain.

Main Methods:

  • A 12-week online intervention delivered via videos and workbook activities taught caregivers behavioral pain management strategies.
  • Caregivers of children aged 2-5 years with SCD were recruited from a hematology clinic.
  • Process measures and baseline/follow-up assessments of pain catastrophizing and caregiver responses to symptoms were collected.

Main Results:

  • Fifty percent of eligible caregivers enrolled; engagement varied, with some caregivers implementing learned strategies.
  • The intervention was rated as high quality, relevant, and useful by engaged participants.
  • Outcome measures for pain catastrophizing and caregiver responses appeared sensitive to change.

Conclusions:

  • The online pain management intervention is acceptable and feasible for caregivers of young children with SCD.
  • Barriers to intervention delivery were identified, suggesting a need for program modification.
  • Further evaluation of a revised intervention is warranted to address implementation challenges and confirm effectiveness.
Abstract