Constituent-driven health policy informed by policy advocacy literature

In this position paper, a theoretical framework is proposed to formulate engaged, evidence-based health policy based on the priorities of constituents. An initial literature review was conducted to gain insight on the gaps in knowledge. Three emergent domains were identified: advocacy, research, and policymaking. The inputs and intermediates to the final output (equitable, evidence-based health policy outcomes) were identified and further elaborated upon in each corresponding section of the paper. Additionally, the main objective of each domain based on the literature review and the implications of each step were noted. Researchers have been identified as crucial to the education of policymakers to ultimately produce informed, evidence-based policy. Community advocates and researchers must attempt to advocate for policy issues as the ultimate role of policymakers in this process necessitates effective engagement to promote political will in the policymaking process. To do so, community advocates must scale-up from the individual to coalitions with strong leadership. In conjunction with a policy champion, these efforts by constituents (community advocates and researchers) would result in the most effective modes of policy development and implementation. The Constituent-driven Policy Advocacy Model (CPAM) introduced in this paper creates the potential for a new precedent in policymaking, in which advocacy, community engagement, evidence synthesis and evaluation, as well as science communication are common practices, leading to more sensitive, targeted, and equitable policy outcomes.