Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.3K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

481
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
481
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.8K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.8K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

172
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
172
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

249
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
249
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

156
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
156

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Educational Interventions for Labor Epidural Awareness in the United States: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Viral but Not Verified: Analyzing Accuracy and Engagement in TikTok Discussions of IUDs.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

A Novel Model to Predict Progression to Death After Withdrawal of Care in Potential Donation-After-Circulatory-Death Heart Donors.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026
Same author

Data Harmonization for Collaborative Research Among Australian and US Registries: A Case Study in Medullary Thyroid Cancer (MTC).

World journal of surgery·2026
Same author

When the Clock Shifts: A Comprehensive Review of Daylight-Saving Time (DST), Circadian Disruption, and Neuropsychological Risk in Chronic Mental Illness.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Pediatric Trauma Trends Before and After Recreational Cannabis Legalization in Nevada: A Retrospective Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.

Children (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K

The Data Error Criteria (DEC) for retrospective studies: development and preliminary application.

Lindsay Buczek1, Fadi Azar1, Justin Bauzon1,2

  • 1Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Journal of Investigative Medicine : the Official Publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research
|January 25, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces the Data Error Criteria (DEC) to identify errors in retrospective chart review (RCR) datasets. Applying the DEC framework helps ensure data quality and accuracy for RCR studies.

Keywords:
Researchdata errorretrospective chart review

More Related Videos

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.6K
A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
10:46

A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data

Published on: December 9, 2015

10.7K
Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
07:31

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack

Published on: May 15, 2020

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Data Science
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Retrospective chart review (RCR) studies depend on clinical data, which is susceptible to errors.
  • Data quality is paramount for accurate clinical research and reliable findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a set of criteria, the Data Error Criteria (DEC), for evaluating RCR datasets.
  • To systematically identify and classify potential data errors within RCR databases.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review to identify common data coding and entry errors.
  • Classification of errors into general, numerical-specific, and categorical variable-specific types.
  • Independent application of the DEC by two reviewers to a de-identified RCR database.

Main Results:

  • A total of 10,168 errors were identified across 28,656 data points.
  • Categorical variable-specific errors were most frequent (7614), followed by general errors (2515).
  • Near-perfect inter-rater agreement was achieved, indicating high reliability of the DEC.

Conclusions:

  • The developed Data Error Criteria (DEC) provide a structured approach to RCR dataset evaluation.
  • Implementing the DEC can significantly improve data quality, reduce analysis errors, and streamline RCR database creation.
  • The DEC framework is essential for enhancing the reliability and efficiency of retrospective chart review studies.