Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
Psychometric validation and testing of the 10-item pediatric daily chest-related electronic patient reported outcome
Rob Arbuckle1, Tim Shea2, Kate Burrows3
1Adelphi Values Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, UK. rob.arbuckle@adelphivalues.com.
Insights
This study validated a chest-related electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary for assessing upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) symptoms in children and adults. The diary proved reliable and responsive, supporting its use in clinical trials for pediatric and adolescent populations.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Research
- Health Informatics
- Pediatric Medicine
Background:
- A novel chest-related electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) diary was developed to capture symptoms in pediatric and adolescent populations during upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).
- Existing methods for symptom assessment in URTI require psychometric evaluation across diverse age groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the chest-related ePRO diary.
- To assess the diary's validity, reliability, and responsiveness in pediatric, adolescent, and adult participants experiencing URTI.
Main Methods:
- A non-interventional validation study involving 195 participants across four age groups (6-8, 9-11, 12-17, and 18+ years).
- Participants completed the chest-related ePRO diary twice daily for 10 days during an acute URTI.
- Psychometric analyses included reliability (internal consistency, test-retest), construct validity (convergent, known groups), and responsiveness to change.
Main Results:
- The diary demonstrated strong quality of completion and similar symptom trajectories across age groups.
- Exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor solution, and test-retest reliability was high (ICC: 0.843-0.894).
- The measure showed strong construct validity, known groups validity, and responsiveness to change.
Conclusions:
- The chest-related ePRO diary is a valid, reliable, and responsive instrument for measuring chest congestion symptoms in URTI.
- Minor differences in disease trajectory between age groups support the diary's utility in interventional studies for pediatric and adolescent populations.
Background And Objective:
The chest-related electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO) diary was recently developed to assess chest-related symptoms experienced by pediatric and adolescent populations during upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). The objective of this research was the psychometric evaluation of the chest-related ePRO diary in pediatric, adolescent and adult participants.
Methods:
This non-interventional, psychometric validation study involved participants (N = 195; n = 42 6-8 years; n = 47 9-11 years; n = 55 12-17 years, n = 51 18+ years) completing the chest-related ePRO diary twice daily for 10 days while experiencing an acute URTI. Preliminary item-level performance and dimensionality results, along with consideration of previous qualitative findings, were used to inform item reduction decisions, the structure of the measure and scoring algorithm development. Subsequent analyses on the finalized measure included assessments of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability), construct validity (convergent validity and known groups validity) and ability to detect change. Comparisons of findings were made between the different age groups as part of the analyses to assess the psychometric properties of the chest-related ePRO diary and to characterize potential differences in the symptom experience of children, adolescents, and adults.
Results:
The measure demonstrated strong quality of completion and showed relatively similar trajectories of symptom scores over time within different age subgroups and good item response distribution properties. Exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor solution in the total population and within age subgroups, and test-retest reliability of the measure was strong (Intra-class correlation: 0.843-0.894 between Visit 1 and Day 1). The measure also demonstrated strong construct validity through high correlations with relevant items on the Child Cold Symptom Questionnaire (CCSQ), strong known groups validity (with statistically significant differences between severity groups) and was responsive to change over time with change groups defined based on change on global items.
Conclusion:
The findings demonstrate that the chest-related ePRO diary provides a valid, reliable, responsive measure of chest congestion symptoms experienced with the common cold in pediatric and adolescent populations, and that only minor differences are present in the disease trajectory when comparing adults to younger participants, supporting the use of the measure in interventional studies.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Assessment of Respiration
Subjective Assessment: Nurses interview the patient to gather information directly during the subjective assessment. It includes questions about the individual's medical history, medications, and symptoms, focusing on past respiratory conditions like...
Reliability and Validity

