Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Large-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing Utilizing Saliva and Transposition Sample Pooling
Published on: June 23, 2022
Limitations of COVID-19 testing and case data for evidence-informed health policy and practice
Elizabeth Alvarez1, Iwona A Bielska2, Stephanie Hopkins2
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, CRL 2nd Floor, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S4K1, Canada. alvare@mcmaster.ca.
Insights
International COVID-19 case data is unreliable due to testing and reporting barriers, leading to an undercount. Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate pandemic response and future preparedness.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Public Health Surveillance
Background:
- The rapid spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) highlighted significant data and surveillance gaps globally.
- Policy decisions and public trust are often based on metrics like case and death numbers, which have inherent limitations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the testing and reporting processes for COVID-19 cases.
- To identify barriers within these processes that contribute to an undercount of infections.
- To provide recommendations for improving data accuracy during the current pandemic and future public health crises.
Main Methods:
- Review of testing and reporting procedures for COVID-19 across multiple countries.
- Identification and documentation of encountered barriers at each stage of data collection.
- Analysis of the impact of these barriers on case ascertainment.
Main Results:
- Significant undercounting of COVID-19 cases is evident due to various barriers in testing and reporting.
- Cross-country comparisons of raw COVID-19 data are challenging due to these inconsistencies.
- The study details specific examples of these barriers from different national contexts.
Conclusions:
- The limitations in COVID-19 data collection necessitate a cautious approach to interpreting case numbers.
- Addressing identified barriers can improve the accuracy of surveillance data.
- Recommendations are provided to enhance current COVID-19 data practices and prepare for future pandemics.
Background:
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) became a pandemic within a matter of months. Analysing the first year of the pandemic, data and surveillance gaps have subsequently surfaced. Yet, policy decisions and public trust in their country's strategies in combating COVID-19 rely on case numbers, death numbers and other unfamiliar metrics. There are many limitations on COVID-19 case counts internationally, which make cross-country comparisons of raw data and policy responses difficult.
Purpose And Conclusions:
This paper presents and describes steps in the testing and reporting process, with examples from a number of countries of barriers encountered in each step, all of which create an undercount of COVID-19 cases. This work raises factors to consider in COVID-19 data and provides recommendations to inform the current situation with COVID-19 as well as issues to be aware of in future pandemics.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Case Studies
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Introduction to Epidemiology

