Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Numerical T1 computation from NMR intensity ratios.

M S Lin1, J W Fletcher, F K Herbig

  • 1Nuclear Medicine Service, VA Medical Center, St. Louis, Missouri 63106.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|January 1, 1986
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-tissue proteogenomic analysis for mechanistic toxicology studies in non-model species.

Environment international·2023
Same author

Forewarning.

Hall's journal of health·2022
Same author

Evaluation of the pylorus with concurrent intraluminal pressure and EndoFLIP in patients with nausea and vomiting.

Neurogastroenterology and motility·2016
Same author

The duration of DNA synthetic (S) period in Zea mays: A genetic control.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Field uniformity of the Japonica rice region of Taiwan as estimated by relative genetic contribution.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik·2013
Same author

Combined ventriculoperitoneal shunt blockage, viscus perforation and migration into urethra, presenting with repeated urinary tract infection.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2011

This study compares three numerical methods for calculating tissue T1 relaxation times from NMR data. The linear-interpolative method is generally faster for precise T1 calculations, while a simple lookup is fastest for lower precision needs.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy
  • Biophysics

Background:

  • Tissue T1 measurement is crucial for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
  • Accurate T1 quantification relies on numerical computation from NMR intensity ratios.
  • Existing methods require efficient and precise algorithms for T1 determination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of three numerical methods for calculating tissue T1.
  • To analyze the impact of ratio function design on computational accuracy.
  • To compare the relative speeds of iterative and lookup methods based on precision requirements.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a ratio function R(T1) dependent on T1 relaxation time.
  • Implemented three numerical methods: linear-interpolative (LI), Newton-Raphson (NR), and a direct lookup.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examined the dependence of computation speed on precision (q) and step size (delta T1).

    • Main Results:

    • All methods require a monotonic R(T1) function for effective computation.
    • Iterative methods (LI and NR) show speed maxima varying with precision (q) and step size (delta T1).
    • LI method is generally faster than NR for iterative computations; lookup is fastest for low precision (q >= 1 ms).

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of numerical method impacts T1 computation speed and accuracy.
    • Iterative methods are suitable for both low and high precision, with LI often being superior.
    • Direct lookup is efficient for low-precision T1 imaging but impractical for high-precision requirements.