Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

118.7K
Overview
118.7K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

139.0K
Overview
139.0K
Protein and Protein Structure02:15

Protein and Protein Structure

80.0K
Proteins are one of the most abundant organic molecules in living systems and have the most diverse range of functions of all macromolecules. Proteins may be structural, regulatory, contractile, or protective. They may serve in transport, storage, or membranes; or they may be toxins or enzymes. Their structures, like their functions, vary greatly. They are all, however, amino acid polymers arranged in a linear sequence.
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme...
80.0K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

34.6K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
34.6K
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER01:29

Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER

3.8K
ER is the primary site for the maturation and folding of soluble and transmembrane secretory proteins. The calnexin cycle is a specific chaperone system that folds and assesses the confirmation of N-glycosylated proteins before they can exit the ER lumen. The primary players of this quality check pipeline are the lectins, ER-resident chaperones, and a glucosyl transferase enzyme. In case the calnexin system in the lumen fails to salvage a misfolded protein, it is transported to the cytoplasm...
3.8K
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

6.3K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
6.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continuation of anti-tuberculosis therapy after Clostridioides difficile infection: a retrospective cohort study.

Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy·2026
Same author

Haemoptysis Caused by Right Intercostal Artery-To-Pulmonary Artery Fistulas Mimicking Cryptogenic Haemoptysis.

Respirology case reports·2026
Same author

Nationwide Survey of Postmortem CT Imaging Protocols among Facilities in Japan.

The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine·2026
Same author

Cross-species gene redesign leveraging ortholog information and generative modeling.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Blind prediction of complex water and ion ensembles around RNA in CASP16.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Blind Prediction of Complex Water and Ion Ensembles Around RNA in CASP16.

Proteins·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Based on Energy Models.

Manato Akiyama1, Kengo Sato2

  • 1Department of Biosciences and Informatics, Keio University, Yokohama, Japan.

Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.)
|January 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study presents RNA secondary structure prediction using the nearest neighbor energy model, detailing parameterization and folding algorithms. The method

Keywords:
Machine learningMaximum expected accuracyMinimum free energyNearest neighbor modelRNA secondary structure predictionThermodynamic parameters

More Related Videos

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

31.6K
Assessment of Immunologically Relevant Dynamic Tertiary Structural Features of the HIV-1 V3 Loop Crown R2 Sequence by ab initio Folding
10:50

Assessment of Immunologically Relevant Dynamic Tertiary Structural Features of the HIV-1 V3 Loop Crown R2 Sequence by ab initio Folding

Published on: September 15, 2010

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

68.8K
RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE
13:42

RNA Secondary Structure Prediction Using High-throughput SHAPE

Published on: May 31, 2013

31.6K
Assessment of Immunologically Relevant Dynamic Tertiary Structural Features of the HIV-1 V3 Loop Crown R2 Sequence by ab initio Folding
10:50

Assessment of Immunologically Relevant Dynamic Tertiary Structural Features of the HIV-1 V3 Loop Crown R2 Sequence by ab initio Folding

Published on: September 15, 2010

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • RNA secondary structure is crucial for gene regulation and function.
  • Predicting RNA secondary structure is a fundamental challenge in bioinformatics.
  • The nearest neighbor energy model is a widely used approach for RNA structure prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce RNA secondary structure prediction using the nearest neighbor energy model.
  • To discuss parameterization methods including experimental and machine learning approaches.
  • To present folding algorithms for minimum free energy and maximum expected accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Nearest neighbor energy model for RNA secondary structure prediction.
  • Parameter determination using experimental data and machine learning.
  • Dynamic programming for folding algorithms (minimum free energy and maximum expected accuracy).

Main Results:

  • Comparison of prediction accuracy against benchmark datasets.
  • Evaluation of the integrated approach for parameter compensation.
  • Demonstration of folding algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Conclusions:

  • The nearest neighbor energy model provides a robust framework for RNA secondary structure prediction.
  • Integrated parameterization approaches enhance prediction accuracy.
  • Dynamic programming algorithms efficiently predict RNA secondary structures.