Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Assessment of the Efficacy of An Osteopathic Treatment in Infants with Biomechanical Impairments to Suckling
Published on: February 5, 2019
The Reliability of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Classification System in Children: Results of a Multi-Center Study
Nora P O'Neill1, Andrew Z Mo1, Patricia E Miller1
1Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Insights
The AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System (UCCS) shows moderate to substantial reliability for pediatric traumatic upper cervical spine injuries. While promising, further refinement is needed for a definitive pediatric classification system.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Pediatric Traumatology
- Spinal Injury Classification
Background:
- Lack of a standardized classification system for pediatric traumatic upper cervical spine injuries.
- Existing adult classification systems require evaluation for pediatric applicability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the reliability and reproducibility of the AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System (UCCS) in classifying pediatric traumatic upper cervical spine injuries.
- To determine the suitability of the UCCS as a foundation for a dedicated pediatric classification system.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 26 pediatric patients (under 18) with upper cervical spine injuries (occipital condyle to C2-C3 joint).
- Nine pediatric orthopedic surgeons independently classified injuries twice using CT and MRI scans, guided by UCCS educational materials.
- Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were analyzed using Fleiss's kappa and Krippendorff's alpha coefficients.
Main Results:
- Sub-classification agreement showed moderate to substantial reliability (kappa estimates 0.55-0.70).
- Inter-rater agreement for fracture location was moderate (kappa 0.56-0.58), but fair for primary classification (A, B, C) (kappa 0.24-0.3).
- Intra-rater reliability for overall sub-classifications ranged from 0.41 to 0.88 (0.75 overall).
Conclusions:
- The AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System demonstrates moderate to substantial reliability in classifying pediatric upper cervical spine injuries.
- Limitations exist in applying the current UCCS to the pediatric population.
- The UCCS serves as a valuable starting point for developing a more specific and effective pediatric classification system.
Background:
There is no uniform classification system for traumatic upper cervical spine injuries in children. This study assesses the reliability and reproducibility of the AO Upper Cervical Spine Classification System (UCCS), which was developed and validated in adults, to children.
Methods:
Twenty-six patients under 18 years old with operative and nonoperative upper cervical injuries, defined as from the occipital condyle to the C2-C3 joint, were identified from 2000 to 2018. Inclusion criteria included the availability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging at the time of injury. Patients with significant comorbidities were excluded. Each case was reviewed by a single senior surgeon to determine eligibility. Educational videos, schematics describing the UCCS, and imaging from 26 cases were sent to 9 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The surgeons classified each case into 3 categories: A, B, and C. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for the initial reading across all 9 raters by Fleiss's kappa coefficient (kF) along with 95% confidence intervals. One month later, the surgeons repeated the classification, and intra-rater reliability was calculated. All images were de-identified and randomized for each read independently. Intra-rater reproducibility across both reads was assessed using Fleiss's kappa. Interpretations for reliability estimates were based on Landis and Koch (1977): 0 to 0.2, slight; 0.2 to 0.4, fair; 0.4 to 0.6, moderate; 0.6 to 0.8, substantial; and >0.8, almost perfect agreement.
Results:
Twenty-six cases were read by 9 raters twice. Sub-classification agreement was moderate to substantial with α κ estimates from 0.55 for the first read and 0.70 for the second read. Inter-rater agreement was moderate (kF 0.56 to 0.58) with respect to fracture location and fair (kF 0.24 to 0.3) with respect to primary classification (A, B, and C). Krippendorff's alpha for intra-rater reliability overall sub-classifications ranged from 0.41 to 0.88, with 0.75 overall raters.
Conclusion:
Traumatic upper cervical injuries are rare in the pediatric population. A uniform classification system can be vital to guide diagnosis and treatment. This study is the first to evaluate the use of the UCCS in the pediatric population. While moderate to substantial agreement was found, limitations to applying the UCCS to the pediatric population exist, and thus the UCCS can be considered a starting point for developing a pediatric classification.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III.
More Related Videos
04:19Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
08:40Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Vertebral Column: Regions and Curvature
Regions of the Vertebral Column
In an adult, the spine is subdivided into five regions: the cervical, the thoracic, the lumbar, the sacral, and the coccygeal region. The spine initially develops as a series of 33 vertebrae; after 20 years of age, the nine bones in the sacral region, five sacral, and four coccygeal bones fuse to form...
Classification of Bones
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
Articulations of the Vertebral Column
General Structure of a Vertebra
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
Overview of the Axial Skeleton
The axial skeleton of the...