Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Minimally Invasive Thumb-sized Pterional Craniotomy for Surgical Clip Ligation of Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
Published on: August 11, 2015
Rupture discrimination of multiple small (< 7 mm) intracranial aneurysms based on machine learning-based cluster
Xin Tong1, Xin Feng2, Fei Peng1
1Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Neurosurgical Institute and Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, 119 Fanyang Road, Beijing, 100070, China.
Machine learning identified three risk groups for small multiple intracranial aneurysms (SMIAs), aiding in rupture risk assessment. This approach helps stratify patients with SMIAs for better management strategies.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Informatics
- Radiology
Background:
- Small multiple intracranial aneurysms (SMIAs) present a higher rupture risk than single aneurysms.
- Current guidelines lack specific recommendations for managing SMIAs.
- Risk stratification for SMIA rupture is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the feasibility of machine learning-based cluster analysis for discriminating SMIA rupture risk.
- To identify distinct patient clusters based on morphological and clinical features.
- To develop a predictive model for SMIA rupture.
Main Methods:
- A multi-institutional cross-sectional study involving 1,427 SMIAs from 660 patients.
- Hierarchical cluster analysis was used for patient classification.
- Machine learning models were constructed and compared using morphological features and identified clusters.
Main Results:
- Three distinct clusters with varying subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) risks were identified.
- Cluster 1 showed the highest SAH risk (75.6%) with a higher prevalence of familial aneurysms.
- Cluster 2 had a moderate SAH risk (38.2%) and more vascular risk factors; Cluster 3 had a lower risk (17.6%).
- Lasso regression indicated significantly higher rupture risk in Cluster 1 (OR 7.391) and Cluster 2 (OR 3.014) compared to Cluster 3.
- The developed model achieved an area under the curve of 0.828 for discriminating SMIA rupture.
Conclusions:
- Unsupervised machine learning effectively identified three clusters with differential SAH risk in SMIA patients.
- The proposed model, utilizing morphological factors and identified clusters, demonstrates good discrimination ability for SMIA ruptures.
- This approach offers a promising tool for risk stratification and management of SMIAs.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
04:25Author Spotlight: Bridging Gaps in Anatomy and Establishing a Foundation for Algorithmic Studies
Published on: December 15, 2023