Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Radiographic analysis of critical anatomical structures for pterygoid implant placement in Chinese patients with a
Q Zhang1, A Abdelrehem2, X Z Qu1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial-Head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
Abstract:
The pterygoid implant is a feasible alternative for posterior dental rehabilitation without grafting; however, the ideal pterygoid implant placement continues to be debated. The aim of this study was to identify effective landmarks and establish valid guidelines to determine the ideal pterygoid implant placement. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data of 100 severely atrophied maxillae requiring implant rehabilitation, obtained between January 2015 and December 2018, were included. The CBCT data were obtained in DICOM format from the radiographic database and imported into Nobel Clinician software (Nobel Biocare) for radiographic analysis. Virtual pterygoid implant placement was successful in 67 maxillae: a 13-mm virtual implant in four maxillae (6.0%), 15-mm in 52 maxillae (77.6%), and 18-mm in 11 maxillae (16.4%). For the virtual pterygoid implant, the mean implant angulation± standard deviation in the anteroposterior axis (sagittal view) was 45.08 ± 2.56° relative to the Frankfort plane. In the buccopalatal axis (coronal view), the mean implant angulation was 64.30 ± 4.99° relative to the Frankfort plane and the mean value for the shortest linear distance between the palatine canal and apical tip of the virtual implant was 3.91 ± 0.62 mm. A 15-mm pterygoid implant placed at 45° in the anteroposterior axis and 60° in the buccopalatal axis (relative to the Frankfort plane), is generally recommended in this Chinese patient population.
