Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Observations on stroboscopic induced motion.

F Micella1, B Pinna

  • 1Dipartimento di Psicologia Generale, Università di Padova, Italy.

Perception
|January 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perceptual Experience of Visual Motion Activates hMT+ Independently From the Physical Reality: fMRI Insights From the Looming Pinna Figure.

Perception·2016
Same author

Surface color from boundaries: a new 'watercolor' illusion.

Vision research·2001
Same author

Last but not least.

Perception·2001
Same author

A new visual illusion of relative motion.

Vision research·2000
Same author

Role of rHuEpo on blood transfusions in preterm infants after the fifteenth day of life.

Pediatric hematology and oncology·1998
Same author

Amodal completion versus induced inhomogeneities in the organization of illusory figures.

Perception·1992

Induced motion perception depends on timing and duration of visual stimuli, not just relative object movement. Experiments show perceived motion speed can differ from the inducing object

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Motion perception
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Subject-relative explanations propose induced motion stems from a misperceived shift in the visual field's median plane.
  • This theory emphasizes asymmetrical stimulation over classical relative motion between objects.
  • Investigating stroboscopic induced motion offers insights into the mechanisms of visual motion perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of interstimulus interval (ISI) duration in stroboscopic induced motion.
  • To examine how the duration of induced object exposure affects perceived motion velocity.
  • To test the validity of subject-relative displacement and frame displacement apportionment hypotheses in motion induction.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an unconventional experimental setup presenting the induced object (spot) only during the ISI between inducing object (frame) exposures.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated ISI duration to assess its effect on induced motion perception (Experiment 1).
  • Varied induced object exposure duration to study its impact on perceived motion velocity (Experiment 2).
  • Created incongruous stimulus displays to differentiate apparent object displacement from induced motion (Experiment 3).

    • Main Results:

    • Perception of induced motion was significantly influenced by the duration of the interstimulus interval.
    • The perceived velocity of induced motion could differ from the inducing object's velocity and was dependent on the induced object's exposure duration.
    • Results demonstrated incongruity between apparent object displacement and induced motion, challenging solely subject-relative explanations.

    Conclusions:

    • Subject-relative displacement is insufficient as the sole determinant of motion induction.
    • The findings present challenges for hypotheses solely based on the apportionment of objective frame displacement.
    • Timing and duration of visual stimuli, particularly the interstimulus interval, play critical roles in motion induction.