Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Interaction between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry: A scoping review for developing a policy brief
Ehsan Zarei1, Amir Ghaffari2, Ali Nikoobar3
1Department of Health Service Management, Virtual School of Medical Education and Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians influence prescribing habits, increasing drug costs. This study proposes policy options to manage these conflicts of interest in Iran
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Medical Ethics
- Pharmaceutical Economics
Background:
- Physician payments from pharmaceutical companies are widespread and linked to altered prescribing patterns, including increased use of brand-name and higher-cost medications.
- These financial relationships can escalate drug expenditures for patients and healthcare systems, necessitating public interest in their regulation.
- Understanding and managing physician-pharmaceutical industry interactions is crucial for cost containment and ethical healthcare delivery in Iran.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and evaluate policy options for managing conflicts of interest (COI) arising from physician-pharmaceutical industry interactions within Iran's healthcare system.
- To provide evidence-based recommendations for policymakers to effectively regulate these financial relationships.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases (Web of Science, PubMed, ProQuest) from 2000 to 2022 to identify relevant policies and interventions.
- Expert opinions from physicians, health policy specialists, transparency advocates, and industry representatives were gathered to categorize interventions.
- Policy options were developed, detailing their advantages, disadvantages, and implementation considerations.
Main Results:
- The systematic search yielded 44 relevant articles from 579 retrieved, identifying 29 distinct interventions and strategies.
- Five primary policy options emerged: prohibition, restriction, physician self-regulation, voluntary industry disclosure, and mandatory industry disclosure.
- Each policy option was analyzed for its potential benefits, drawbacks, and feasibility within the Iranian context.
Conclusions:
- The study proposes actionable policy options, supported by current evidence, to help Iranian policymakers manage conflicts of interest in physician-pharmaceutical industry relationships.
- A combined strategy, initially promoting physician and industry self-regulation for transparency, followed by mandatory disclosure and specific financial restrictions, is recommended.
- Implementing these policies can contribute to a more transparent and cost-effective healthcare system by mitigating undue influence on prescribing practices.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Drug Administration and Therapy Phases: Overview
The pharmaceutical phase focuses on leveraging the physicochemical properties of the drug to design and manufacture an effective product. Variants include orally administered tablets or capsules, topical creams or ointments, and parenteral-delivery solutions or emulsions.
The pharmacokinetic phase...
Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics: Overview
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Regulation
Bioequivalence: Overview

