Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Estimating clinical risk in gene regions from population sequencing cohort data
James D Fife1, Christopher A Cassa1,2
1Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
None:
While pathogenic variants significantly increase disease risk in many genes, it is still challenging to estimate the clinical impact of rare missense variants more generally. Even in genes such as BRCA2 or PALB2 , large cohort studies find no significant association between breast cancer and rare germline missense variants collectively. Here we introduce REGatta, a method to improve the estimation of clinical risk in gene segments. We define gene regions using the density of pathogenic diagnostic reports, and then calculate the relative risk in each of these regions using 109,581 exome sequences from women in the UK Biobank. We apply this method in seven established breast cancer genes, and identify regions in each gene with statistically significant differences in breast cancer incidence for rare missense carriers. Even in genes with no significant difference at the gene level, this approach significantly separates rare missense variant carriers at higher or lower risk ( BRCA2 regional model OR=1.46 [1.12, 1.79], p=0.0036 vs. BRCA2 gene model OR=0.96 [0.85,1.07] p=0.4171). We find high concordance between these regional risk estimates and high-throughput functional assays of variant impact. We compare with existing methods and the use of protein domains (Pfam) as regions, and find REGatta better identifies individuals at elevated or reduced risk. These regions provide useful priors which can potentially be used to improve risk assessment and clinical management.
More Related Videos
09:34Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Relative Risk
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...