Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay

The Upf proteins that carry out nonsense-mediated decay (NMD) are found in all eukaryotic organisms, including humans. Each protein has an individual role, but they need to work in collaboration. Upf1 is an ATP-dependent RNA helicase that unwinds the RNA helix. Because Upf1 can unwind any RNA, Upf2 and Upf3 are required to help Upf1 discriminate between nonsense and normal mRNAs.
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...

Mutations

Mutations

Point and Frameshift Mutations

Point and Frameshift Mutations

Point mutations are genetic alterations involving the change of a single nucleotide base pair in DNA. Depending on how the alteration affects protein synthesis, they can lead to various consequences.Point mutations fall into the following types:Silent mutations occur when a nucleotide change does not alter the amino acid sequence due to the redundancy of the genetic code. For instance, changing ACC to ACA still encodes threonine, leaving the protein function unaffected. This occurs because...

Genome Copying Errors

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Translation

Translation

Translation is the process of synthesizing proteins from the genetic information carried by messenger RNA (mRNA). Following transcription, it constitutes the final step in the expression of genes. This process is carried out by ribosomes, complexes of protein and specialized RNA molecules. Ribosomes, transfer RNA (tRNA), and other proteins produce a chain of amino acids—the polypeptide—as the end product of translation.
Translation Produces the Building Blocks of Life
Proteins are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

PON-Del predictor for sequence retaining protein deletions.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Same author

Proteome-Wide Analysis of Human Deletions.

Proteins·2025

Same author

ProToxin, a Predictor of Protein Toxicity.

Toxins·2025

Same author

Sequence-Based Prediction for Protein Solvent Accessibility.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025

Same author

BTKbase, Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Variant Database in X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia: Looking Back and Ahead.

Human mutation·2025

Same author

PON-P3: Accurate Prediction of Pathogenicity of Amino Acid Substitutions.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 12, 2025

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

Systematic errors in annotations of truncations, loss-of-function and synonymous variants.

Mauno Vihinen¹

¹Department of Experimental Medical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Frontiers in Genetics

|January 30, 2023

Summary

Accurate genetic variation annotation is crucial for understanding disease. This study identifies systematic errors in current annotation practices and proposes solutions for precise genetic variant interpretation.

Keywords:

frameshift variation loss-of-function variation mutation protein truncation synonymous variation variation annotation errors

More Related Videos

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 12, 2025

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

In Vivo Modeling of the Morbid Human Genome using Danio rerio

Published on: August 24, 2013

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease

Published on: April 4, 2018

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila

Published on: August 20, 2019

Area of Science:

Genetics
Bioinformatics
Molecular Biology

Background:

Next-generation sequencing generates vast amounts of genetic variation data.
Automated annotation tools are used to predict the functional consequences of these variations.
Current annotation practices face challenges in nomenclature, database organization, and conceptual misuse.

Purpose of the Study:

To identify and address systematic errors in genetic variation annotation.
To improve the accuracy of functional consequence prediction for genetic variants.
To resolve issues related to protein truncations, loss-of-function variants, and synonymous variants.

Main Methods:

Analysis of common systematic errors in genetic variation annotation pipelines.
Review of nomenclature and database practices.
Description of specific problem cases including protein truncations, loss-of-function, and synonymous variants.

Main Results:

Identified systematic errors that hinder correct annotation and further analysis of genetic variations.
Highlighted issues with presumed protein truncations and loss-of-function variant classifications.
Addressed synonymous variants that incorrectly lead to sequence changes or protein loss.

Conclusions:

Addressing identified systematic errors is essential for accurate genetic variant annotation.
Improved nomenclature, database practices, and conceptual understanding are needed.
Correcting these issues will enable more reliable downstream analysis of genetic variation data.