Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Visualization of Streptococcus pneumoniae within Cardiac Microlesions and Subsequent Cardiac Remodeling
Published on: April 7, 2015
A Rare Case of Persistent Bacteremia: Leadless Micra Pacemaker Endocarditis
Himax Patel1, Sean Harrell1, Haitham Hreibe1
1Augusta University Medical Center, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30912, USA.
Abstract:
Leadless pacing systems have revolutionized the field of electrophysiology given its low complication rates and almost non-existent rate of infections compared with traditional pacemakers. These devices boast resistance to infections given its unique features; however, as described in this report, device-related infection from these leadless devices is still possible. In patients with leadless pacing system that is persistently bacteremic in the future, evaluation of the device with transesophageal echocardiogram or intracardiac echocardiography should be performed, and if vegetation is noted on the device, device extraction should highly be considered, along with empiric intravenous antibiotics. Lastly, new leadless device should not be re-implanted within 2 weeks of the removal of the infected device to prevent seeding of the new device.
Insights
Leadless pacing systems offer low infection risks, but infections can still occur. Persistent bacteremia necessitates device evaluation and potential removal to prevent complications.
Area of Science:
- Electrophysiology
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Leadless pacing systems have significantly reduced complications and infection rates compared to traditional pacemakers.
- The unique design of leadless devices contributes to their inherent resistance to infections.
Observation:
- Despite their advantages, leadless pacing systems are not entirely immune to device-related infections.
- This report highlights a case where infection associated with a leadless pacing system occurred.
Findings:
- Persistent bacteremia in patients with leadless pacemakers warrants investigation.
- Transesophageal echocardiogram or intracardiac echocardiography can detect vegetation on the leadless device.
- Device extraction combined with empiric intravenous antibiotics is recommended if vegetation is identified.
Implications:
- Early recognition and management of leadless pacemaker infections are crucial.
- A waiting period of at least two weeks before re-implantation is advised after infected device removal to prevent reinfection.
- Further research into preventing and managing leadless device infections is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis I: Introduction
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

