Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025
Normothermic Negative Pressure Ventilation Ex Situ Lung Perfusion: Evaluation of Lung Function and Metabolism
Published on: February 14, 2022
Individualized dynamic PEEP (dynPEEP) vs. positive pressure ventilation in delivery room management: A retrospective
Sijie Song1, Yefang Zhu1, Jie Li1
1Department of Pediatrics, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Objective:
Although nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is recommended in delivery room (DR) management for preterm infants, the effect of delivering nCPAP at 6-8 cmH2O is not satisfactory. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective cohort study to compare the effects of individualized dynamic positive end-expiratory pressure (dynPEEP) vs. positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in the DR on clinical outcomes.
Methods:
Preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) less than 30 weeks who received PPV (peak inspiratory pressure, PIP/PEEP 15-25/6-8 cmH2O) from August 2018 to July 2020 were included as Cohort 1 (PPV group, n = 55), and those who received dynPEEP (nCPAP 8-15 cmH2O) from June 2020 to April 2022 were included as Cohort 2 (dynPEEP group, n = 62). Primary outcomes included the DR intubation rate and the bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) rate. The secondary outcomes included DR stabilization, transfer, admission, respiratory function, and other outcomes.
Results:
The percentage of singleton infants was higher in the PPV group (63.6%) than in the dynPEEP group (22.6%, p = 0.000). The DR intubation and chest compression rates were higher in the PPV group (80.0% and 18.2%, respectively) than in the dynPEEP group (45.2%, p = 0.000; 3.0%, p = 0.008, respectively). The percentage of patients with 5-min Apgar scores < 5 was higher in the PPV group (9.1%) than in the dynPEEP group (0%, p = 0.016). The partial pressure of carbon dioxide was lower in the PPV group (49.77 ± 11.28) than in the dynPEEP group (56.44 ± 13.17, p = 0.004), and lactate levels were higher in the PPV group (3.60 (2.10, 5.90)) than in the dynPEEP group (2.25 (1.38, 3.33), p = 0.002). No significant differences in the BPD rate or other secondary outcomes were noted.
Conclusions:
In this retrospective cohort study, the dynPEEP strategy reduced the need for DR intubation compared with PPV. The dynPEEP strategy is feasible and potentially represents an alternative respiratory strategy to PPV. Nevertheless, a randomized control trial is needed to evaluate the dynPEEP strategy.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
01:29Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
01:14Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
01:23Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:19Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...