Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2025

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
Published on: August 30, 2013
Improving Bayesian radiological profiling of waste drums using Dirichlet priors, Gaussian process priors, and
Eric Laloy1, Bart Rogiers1, An Bielen2
1Waste and Disposal, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Belgium.
Abstract:
We present three methodological improvements of our recently proposed approach for Bayesian inference of the radionuclide inventory in radioactive waste drums, from radiological measurements. First we resort to the Dirichlet distribution for the prior distribution of the isotopic vector. The Dirichlet distribution possesses the attractive property that the elements of its vector samples sum up to 1. Second, we demonstrate that such Dirichlet priors can be incorporated within an hierarchical modeling of the prior uncertainty in the isotopic vector, when prior information about isotopic composition is available. Our used Bayesian hierarchical modeling framework makes use of this available information but also acknowledges its uncertainty by letting to a controlled extent the information content of the indirect measurement data (i.e., gamma and neutron counts) shape the actual prior distribution of the isotopic vector. Third, we propose to regularize the Bayesian inversion by using Gaussian process (GP) prior modeling when inferring 1D spatially-distributed mass or, equivalently, activity distributions. As of uncertainty in the efficiencies, we keep using the same stylized drum modeling approach as proposed in our previous work to account for the source distribution uncertainty across the vertical direction of the drum. A series of synthetic tests followed by application to a real waste drum show that combining hierarchical modeling of the prior isotopic composition uncertainty together with GP prior modeling of the vertical Pu profile across the drum works well. We also find that our GP prior can handles both cases with and without spatial correlation. Of course, our GP prior modeling framework only makes sense in the context of spatial inference. Furthermore, the computational times involved by our approach are on the order of a few hours, say about 2, to provide uncertainty estimates for all variables of interest in the considered inverse problem. This warrants further investigations to speed up the inference.
More Related Videos
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015
14:27Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
Published on: June 26, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Probability Histograms
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...