Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Skeletal metastases.

J H Thrall1, B I Ellis

  • 1Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Medical Imaging, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.

Radiologic Clinics of North America
|November 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrated diagnostics: proceedings from the 9th biennial symposium of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology.

European radiology·2012
Same author

Effect of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Technical cost of CT examinations.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Mass general provides case study in radiology asset management.

Diagnostic imaging·2001
Same author

Utilization management remains elusive goal.

Diagnostic imaging·2000
Same author

Cost of hospital-based radiological examinations: an update.

European radiology·2000

Radionuclide skeletal scintigraphy is sensitive for detecting bone metastases but lacks specificity. Radiography can confirm malignancy, while CT and MR may incidentally find lesions.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Nuclear Medicine

Background:

  • Malignancy evaluation often requires assessing skeletal involvement.
  • Imaging plays a crucial role in identifying metastatic bone disease.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the utility of various imaging modalities in evaluating skeletal metastases.
  • To delineate the strengths and limitations of each technique.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of radionuclide skeletal scintigraphy.
  • Analysis of standard radiography findings.
  • Consideration of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.

Main Results:

  • Radionuclide scintigraphy offers high sensitivity for detecting bone metastases but is nonspecific.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Standard radiography can confirm malignancy with characteristic lytic or blastic lesions.
  • CT and MR are not primary tools for detecting skeletal metastases but may identify incidental findings.

    • Conclusions:

    • Imaging modalities have distinct roles in the detection and characterization of skeletal metastases.
    • A combination of imaging techniques may be necessary for comprehensive evaluation.